From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: shemminger@osdl.org
Cc: hagen@jauu.net, jheffner@psc.edu, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: don't allow unfair congestion control to be built without warning
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:17:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061027.141749.41635827.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061027103016.3e8514d7@freekitty>
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:30:16 -0700
> My proposed method restricting TCP choices to fair algorithms.
> This a net wide, not system wide issue, it should not be done
> by kernel policy choice (capability), but by a build choice.
I think this sucks even worse than the current situation.
How difficult is it to understand that an administrator might
like to be able to build in and experiment with some congestion
control algorithms, yet still be able to keep his normal users
from using them?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-27 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-25 18:08 [RFC] tcp: setsockopt congestion control autoload Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-25 23:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-26 5:22 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-26 14:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-26 14:57 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-26 15:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-26 17:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-26 20:55 ` David Miller
2006-10-26 17:29 ` John Heffner
2006-10-26 20:57 ` David Miller
2006-10-26 22:44 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-26 22:53 ` John Heffner
2006-10-26 23:52 ` [PATCH] Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN to change congestion control algorithm Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-26 23:59 ` Ian McDonald
2006-10-27 0:07 ` David Miller
2006-10-27 0:20 ` Ian McDonald
2006-10-27 0:02 ` David Miller
2006-10-27 10:43 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-27 14:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 15:21 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-27 15:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 17:30 ` [PATCH] tcp: don't allow unfair congestion control to be built without warning Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 17:43 ` John Heffner
2006-10-27 17:59 ` [PATCH] tcp: allow restricting congestion control choices Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 21:17 ` David Miller [this message]
2006-10-27 21:24 ` [PATCH] tcp: don't allow unfair congestion control to be built without warning Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 21:37 ` David Miller
2006-10-27 21:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 22:12 ` David Miller
2006-10-27 22:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 22:24 ` David Miller
2006-10-28 0:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-28 3:10 ` [RFC] tcp: available congetsion control Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 21:22 ` [PATCH] Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN to change congestion control algorithm David Miller
2006-10-27 1:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 18:14 ` [PATCH] tcp: setsockopt congestion control autoload Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061027.141749.41635827.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hagen@jauu.net \
--cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).