netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	jheffner@psc.edu, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tcp: don't allow unfair congestion control to be built without warning
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:30:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061027103016.3e8514d7@freekitty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45422A31.7070806@osdl.org>

My proposed method restricting TCP choices to fair algorithms.
This a net wide, not system wide issue, it should not be done
by kernel policy choice (capability), but by a build choice.

--- sky2.orig/net/ipv4/Kconfig	2006-10-27 10:10:47.000000000 -0700
+++ sky2/net/ipv4/Kconfig	2006-10-27 10:15:56.000000000 -0700
@@ -470,6 +470,16 @@
 
 if TCP_CONG_ADVANCED
 
+config TCP_CONG_UNFAIR
+        bool "Allow unfair congestion control algorithms"
+	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
+        ---help---
+	  Some of the congestion control algorithms are for testing
+	  and research purposes and should not deployed on public
+	  networks because of the possiblity of unfair behavior.
+	  These algorithms may be useful for future development
+	  or comparison purposes.
+
 config TCP_CONG_BIC
 	tristate "Binary Increase Congestion (BIC) control"
 	default m
@@ -551,7 +561,7 @@
 
 config TCP_CONG_SCALABLE
 	tristate "Scalable TCP"
-	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
+	depends on TCP_CONG_UNFAIR
 	default n
 	---help---
 	Scalable TCP is a sender-side only change to TCP which uses a

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-27 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-25 18:08 [RFC] tcp: setsockopt congestion control autoload Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-25 23:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-26  5:22 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-26 14:34   ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-26 14:57     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-26 15:23       ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-26 17:05         ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-26 20:55       ` David Miller
2006-10-26 17:29 ` John Heffner
2006-10-26 20:57   ` David Miller
2006-10-26 22:44   ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-26 22:53     ` John Heffner
2006-10-26 23:52     ` [PATCH] Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN to change congestion control algorithm Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-26 23:59       ` Ian McDonald
2006-10-27  0:07         ` David Miller
2006-10-27  0:20           ` Ian McDonald
2006-10-27  0:02       ` David Miller
2006-10-27 10:43         ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-27 14:41           ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 15:21             ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-27 15:48               ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 17:30                 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2006-10-27 17:43                   ` [PATCH] tcp: don't allow unfair congestion control to be built without warning John Heffner
2006-10-27 17:59                     ` [PATCH] tcp: allow restricting congestion control choices Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 21:17                   ` [PATCH] tcp: don't allow unfair congestion control to be built without warning David Miller
2006-10-27 21:24                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 21:37                       ` David Miller
2006-10-27 21:59                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 22:12                           ` David Miller
2006-10-27 22:21                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 22:24                               ` David Miller
2006-10-28  0:48                                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-28  3:10                                   ` [RFC] tcp: available congetsion control Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 21:22             ` [PATCH] Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN to change congestion control algorithm David Miller
2006-10-27  1:03       ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 18:14 ` [PATCH] tcp: setsockopt congestion control autoload Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061027103016.3e8514d7@freekitty \
    --to=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hagen@jauu.net \
    --cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).