From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: don't allow unfair congestion control to be built without warning Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:59:13 -0700 Message-ID: <20061027145913.04dc0e5f@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20061027103016.3e8514d7@freekitty> <20061027.141749.41635827.davem@davemloft.net> <20061027142402.07a47f3f@freekitty> <20061027.143701.85411558.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hagen@jauu.net, jheffner@psc.edu, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:21210 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750732AbWJ0V7d (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:59:33 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20061027.143701.85411558.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:37:01 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:24:02 -0700 > > > Only some (very few) have any bad consequences. So the typical > > distribution should be able to switch with most available for everyone, > > and only a few needing special privileges. > > I would strongly disagree as we've had several OOPS'er class bugs in > the less frequently used algorithms. > Then tag those as restricted. Why should we keep app's away from the simple ones.