From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dada1@cosmosbay.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Any strong reason why socket dentries are hashed in global d_hash table ?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:15:27 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061030.141527.74717587.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45466EFF.5060108@cosmosbay.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:30:39 +0100
> In sock_attach_fd(), we are currently using
>
> d_add(file->f_dentry, SOCK_INODE(sock));
>
> This has the effect to insert the dentry into the dentry_hashtable.
>
> I was wondering if it is really necessary : On a machine with many sockets,
> the dentry_hashtable lookups may be slowed down for no good reason. (sockets
> are not accessable by other means than socket() syscall, and not subject to
> 'unuse and LRU freeable syndrom').
>
> If we replace d_add(file->f_dentry, SOCK_INODE(sock)) call by
> d_instantiate(file->f_dentry, SOCK_INODE(sock)), we also avoid using rcu
> callback when socket is closed. (We would have to not provide a d_op->d_delete
> () method in sockfs_dentry_operations)
Sounds like a useful optimization for sure.
You can't mount sockfs on the filesystem, but they are visible
via /proc/${pid}/fd/, I wonder if the dentry hashing is required
just to make those nodes visible properly?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-30 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-29 21:24 [PATCH] DCCP: fix printk format warnings Randy Dunlap
2006-10-30 0:04 ` David Miller
2006-10-30 21:30 ` [RFC] Any strong reason why socket dentries are hashed in global d_hash table ? Eric Dumazet
2006-10-30 22:15 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061030.141527.74717587.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox