Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dada1@cosmosbay.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Any strong reason why socket dentries are hashed in global d_hash table ?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:15:27 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061030.141527.74717587.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45466EFF.5060108@cosmosbay.com>

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:30:39 +0100

> In sock_attach_fd(), we are currently using
> 
> d_add(file->f_dentry, SOCK_INODE(sock));
> 
> This has the effect to insert the dentry into the dentry_hashtable.
> 
> I was wondering if it is really necessary : On a machine with many sockets, 
> the dentry_hashtable lookups may be slowed down for no good reason. (sockets 
> are not accessable by other means than socket() syscall, and not subject to 
> 'unuse and LRU freeable syndrom').
> 
> If we replace d_add(file->f_dentry, SOCK_INODE(sock)) call by
> d_instantiate(file->f_dentry, SOCK_INODE(sock)), we also avoid using rcu 
> callback when socket is closed. (We would have to not provide a d_op->d_delete 
> () method in sockfs_dentry_operations)

Sounds like a useful optimization for sure.

You can't mount sockfs on the filesystem, but they are visible
via /proc/${pid}/fd/, I wonder if the dentry hashing is required
just to make those nodes visible properly?

      reply	other threads:[~2006-10-30 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-29 21:24 [PATCH] DCCP: fix printk format warnings Randy Dunlap
2006-10-30  0:04 ` David Miller
2006-10-30 21:30   ` [RFC] Any strong reason why socket dentries are hashed in global d_hash table ? Eric Dumazet
2006-10-30 22:15     ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061030.141527.74717587.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox