netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Wake On Lan device semantics
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:20:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061103152025.5d27bd8d@freekitty> (raw)

I am working on getting WOL to work on sky2 (and then skge). But in the process I
noticed that the semantics of WOL seems to be device dependent. I assume that WOL
should work when device is suspended. But some drivers also support WOL when
the device is down (or even removed).

Now I know some distro's like Ubuntu take down and then remove every network
device on suspend. That's their problem, if they don't want to use suspend
as intended because they want to handle broken hardware, that's their problem.

It doesn't seem like a good idea for a network device to wake the system
if it is down. Maybe if the kernel fully supported dormant, maybe, but
when device is down it shouldn't impact the system.


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>

             reply	other threads:[~2006-11-03 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-03 23:20 Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2006-11-03 23:44 ` Wake On Lan device semantics Auke Kok
2006-11-03 23:48   ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-04  1:35     ` Auke Kok
2006-11-03 23:50   ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-04  1:36     ` Auke Kok
2006-11-04  1:37       ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-04  1:44         ` Auke Kok
2006-11-03 23:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-04  0:02   ` David Miller
2006-11-04  0:11     ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-04  1:53       ` Auke Kok
2006-11-04  0:42     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-04  1:02       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061103152025.5d27bd8d@freekitty \
    --to=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).