From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node() Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 00:39:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20061106233900.GA7148@lst.de> References: <20061104225629.GA31437@lst.de> <20061104230648.GB640@redhat.com> <20061104235323.GA1353@lst.de> <20061105.002237.18309940.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:13273 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753728AbWKFXjH (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:39:07 -0500 To: David Miller Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061105.002237.18309940.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:22:37AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > Looks good to me. So what's the right path to get this in? There's one patch touching MM code, one adding something to the driver core and then finally a networking patch depending on the previous two. Do you want to take them all and send them in through the networking tree? Or should we put the burden on Andrew?