From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] skge: version 1.9 Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:51:04 -0800 Message-ID: <20061107095104.734326cc@freekitty> References: <20061005224949.456192755@osdl.org> <20061005225209.769741968@osdl.org> <20061107132506.GS2667@mathom.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:9681 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932712AbWKGRvJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:51:09 -0500 To: Michael Stone In-Reply-To: <20061107132506.GS2667@mathom.us> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 08:25:07 -0500 Michael Stone wrote: > The skge 1.9 patch is looking good on older syskonnect fiber cards. > Stability issues seem to be taken care of and performance is good. There > are some strange interactions with bonding, however. If I try to put > both interfaces of an sk-9844 into a bonded interface, I only see > traffic from one of them. If I try to config the bonded interface down, > the system hangs. If I tcpdump either of the individual interfaces > (before bonding them) I see all the expected traffic. > > Mike Stone Which form of bonding link checking are you using. It could be that bonding MII checking is confused. -- Stephen Hemminger