From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jay Vosburgh Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] skge: version 1.9 Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:47:57 -0800 Message-ID: <200611100047.kAA0lvZt002542@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> References: <20061005224949.456192755@osdl.org> <20061005225209.769741968@osdl.org> <20061107132506.GS2667@mathom.us> <200611072028.kA7KSQZt032181@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <20061110003448.GE2667@mathom.us> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:41907 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965765AbWKJAsC (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:48:02 -0500 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAA0lw7j023897 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:47:58 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id kAA0lwGI291710 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:47:58 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kAA0lwZ3028752 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:47:58 -0500 To: Michael Stone In-reply-to: <20061110003448.GE2667@mathom.us> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Michael Stone wrote: >On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 12:28:26PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >> Can you provide some bonding configuration details? Which mode, >>options, etc, as well as the relevant bits from dmesg (you can send it >> to me privately if it's huge)? > >I think I sent another message that I'm just doing ifenslave bond0 eth2 >ifenslave bond0 eth3 with no particular options set. I was thinking of the options to the bonding driver (probably in the network configuration or /etc/modprobe.conf); a reasonable set of information is in /proc/net/bonding/bond0, so that's a good place to start, along with whatever "uname -a" prints (kernel version, architecture, mostly). [...] The application is a network sniffer, and >the cards are forced to 1000Mbps/full duplex because the other end doesn't >negotiate. What's the relevant part of dmesg? Well, pretty much anything from the bonding driver or the ethernet driver. -J --- -Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com