From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Wu Subject: Re: d80211: RFC: divide by zero when hw->maxssi not set Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:59:47 -0500 Message-ID: <200611171859.51941.flamingice@sourmilk.net> References: <20061117235109.GA11885@devicescape.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5881385.ejcelDNgF4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Larry Finger , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp.rutgers.edu ([128.6.72.243]:41869 "EHLO annwn14.rutgers.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756052AbWKRABX (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:01:23 -0500 To: David Kimdon In-Reply-To: <20061117235109.GA11885@devicescape.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --nextPart5881385.ejcelDNgF4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 17 November 2006 18:51, David Kimdon wrote: > - reject registration of devices which do not set maxssi > - do not attempt to report link quality for drivers which do not > set maxssi > - other ideas? > I've noticed that too. p54 didn't get a driver update when maxssi was added= =2E I=20 don't mind adding a dummy maxssi just to make sure we don't divide by zero.= =20 In fact, I'm going to come up with a patch for p54 to do that soon. =2DMichael Wu --nextPart5881385.ejcelDNgF4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFXkz3T3Oqt9AH4aERAizPAJ9ItKOr/DUmX1hxDhzhKrYmXMICKQCcCG/a 3LeiKQ7AL3nXNKtstBNGxv0= =b4i2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5881385.ejcelDNgF4--