netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Simon Barber <simon@devicescape.com>,
	Jouni Malinen <jkm@devicescape.com>,
	Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>,
	David Kimdon <david.kimdon@devicescape.com>,
	Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>,
	Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] d80211: fix scan issues with new ops
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:15:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611191715.34225.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1163895673.15473.11.camel@johannes.berg>

On Sunday 19 November 2006 01:21, Johannes Berg wrote:
> If hardware shall do scanning, the hw_scan operation must be set. However,
> if the driver is for multiple cards that may or may not do hardware
> scanning, it'll need a flag.
> 
> Similar issues arise with passive_scan().
> 
> This patch introduces flags to fix these issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> 
> ---
> more fallout from my earlier patches... this time it's the scanning ops
> that were still used as flags as well as ops.
> 
> --- wireless-dev.orig/include/net/d80211.h	2006-11-19 01:08:12.439520302 +0100
> +++ wireless-dev/include/net/d80211.h	2006-11-19 01:14:14.859520302 +0100
> @@ -504,6 +504,12 @@ struct ieee80211_wiphy {
>  	/* do hardware fragmentation */
>  #define IEEE80211_HW_FRAG (1<<15)
>  
> +	/* hardware does scanning instead of software */
> +#define IEEE80211_HW_PASSIVE_SCAN (1<<16)
> +
> +	/* hardware does scanning instead of software */
> +#define IEEE80211_HW_SCAN (1<<17)
> +
>  	u32 flags;			/* hardware flags defined above */
>  
>  	/* Set to the size of a needed device specific skb headroom for TX skbs. */
> @@ -627,7 +633,8 @@ struct ieee80211_ops {
>                              struct ieee80211_scan_conf *conf);
>  
>  	/* Ask the hardware to service the scan request, no need to start
> -	 * the scan state machine in stack. */
> +	 * the scan state machine in stack.
> +	 * This callback goes along with the IEEE80211_HW_SCAN flag */
>  	int (*hw_scan)(struct ieee80211_wiphy *wiphy, u8 *ssid,
>  		       size_t len);
>  
> --- wireless-dev.orig/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c	2006-11-19 01:07:49.509520302 +0100
> +++ wireless-dev/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c	2006-11-19 01:18:49.879520302 +0100
> @@ -2552,7 +2552,7 @@ int ieee80211_sta_req_scan(struct net_de
>  
>  	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: starting scan\n", dev->name);
>  
> -	if (local->ops->hw_scan) {
> +	if (local->ops->hw_scan && local->wiphy.flags & IEEE80211_HW_SCAN) {

Please wrap this into ()

(Hm, actually, the compiler should complain on this...)

>  		int rc = local->ops->hw_scan(local_to_wiphy(local),
>  					    ssid, ssid_len);
>  		if (!rc) {
> --- wireless-dev.orig/net/d80211/ieee80211_scan.c	2006-11-19 01:18:19.249520302 +0100
> +++ wireless-dev/net/d80211/ieee80211_scan.c	2006-11-19 01:18:22.599520302 +0100
> @@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ static void ieee80211_scan_start(struct 
>  	struct ieee80211_channel *chan = NULL;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!local->hw->passive_scan) {
> +	if (!local->ops->passive_scan ||
> +	    !(local->wiphy.flags & IEEE80211_HW_PASSIVE_SCAN)) {
>  		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Scan handler called, yet the hardware "
>  		       "does not support passive scanning. Disabled.\n",
>  		       local->mdev->name);
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-19 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-17 22:27 [PATCH 0/10] d80211: move away from wmaster towards wiphy Johannes Berg
2006-11-17 22:50 ` [PATCH] d80211: remove useless driver name field Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:32   ` Jouni Malinen
2006-11-20 18:40     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 22:21       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-20 22:33         ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:44     ` Michael Wu
2006-11-17 23:24 ` [PATCH 0/10] d80211: move away from wmaster towards wiphy Pavel Roskin
2006-11-18  0:16 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-18 23:53 ` [PATCH] d80211: remove IEEE80211_CONF_SW_{EN,DE}CRYPT Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 16:16   ` Michael Buesch
2006-11-19  0:04 ` [PATCH] d80211: remove calib_int Johannes Berg
2006-11-19  0:21 ` [PATCH] d80211: fix scan issues with new ops Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 15:56   ` David Kimdon
2006-11-19 16:34     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 16:50       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 16:55       ` David Kimdon
2006-11-19 16:57         ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 17:25           ` David Kimdon
2006-11-19 17:54             ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 16:15   ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2006-11-19 16:35     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 0/13] move d80211 away from netdev towards wiphy Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:22   ` [PATCH 1/13] d80211: clean up some stupid list and loop code Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 11:01     ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-20 11:58       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:55         ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:23   ` [PATCH 2/13] d80211: reduce mdev usage Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:23   ` [PATCH 3/13] " Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:26   ` [PATCH 4/13] d80211: reduce mdev usage, change ieee80211_rx_mgmt Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 12:08     ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-20 12:25       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:27   ` [PATCH 5/13] d80211: reduce master ieee80211_ptr deref in scan routines Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:28   ` [PATCH 6/13] d80211: change the identifier netdev to ieee80211_hw Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 17:57     ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-20 18:04       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:52       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 22:45     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-21 17:48       ` [PATCH] d80211: use ieee80211_hw.dev Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:29   ` [PATCH 7/13] d80211: add a perm_addr hardware property Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 23:20     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:54       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:29   ` [PATCH 8/13] d80211: introduce IEEE80211_HW_FRAG flag Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:30   ` [PATCH 9/13] d80211: remove useless driver name field Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:31   ` [PATCH 10/13] bcm43xx: update to new d80211 driver API Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:43     ` Michael Buesch
2006-11-19 19:52       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:31   ` [PATCH 11/13] d80211: remove IEEE80211_CONF_SW_{EN,DE}CRYPT Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:32   ` [PATCH 12/13] d80211: remove calib_int Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:33   ` [PATCH 13/13] d80211: fix scan issues with new ops Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 23:32   ` [PATCH 0/13] move d80211 away from netdev towards wiphy Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 19:14     ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-22 19:18       ` [RFC 0/3] more power to cfg80211 Johannes Berg
2006-11-22 19:22         ` [RFC 1/3] cfg80211: handle wiphy, use wiphy in netdev, do wiphy sysfs Johannes Berg
2006-11-22 19:24         ` [RFC 2/3] d80211: use new wiphy stuff from cfg80211 Johannes Berg
2006-11-22 19:25         ` [RFC 3/3] bcm43xx: API update Johannes Berg
2006-12-11 13:03         ` [RFC 0/3] more power to cfg80211 Jiri Benc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200611191715.34225.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=david.kimdon@devicescape.com \
    --cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
    --cc=hong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
    --cc=jkm@devicescape.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simon@devicescape.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).