From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Michlmayr Subject: Re: [patch] Performance enhancement patches for SB1250 MAC Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:26:40 +0000 Message-ID: <20061121142640.GA32573@unjust.cyrius.com> References: <20061120153548.71f90b7a@freekitty> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Yang, Steve" , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com ([65.19.161.204]:49681 "EHLO sorrow.cyrius.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933494AbWKUO0u (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:26:50 -0500 To: Stephen Hemminger Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061120153548.71f90b7a@freekitty> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Stephen Hemminger [2006-11-20 15:35]: > > 1. I've submitted two patches, one for NAPI and the other for SKB_Cache. > > They can go in individually. You've expressed objections to SKB_Cache. > > What about the one for NAPI? > Yes, the NAPI one is great. Should Steve resend the patch so it can be added or is it queued up already? It would be nice to have this in 2.6.20. -- Martin Michlmayr tbm@cyrius.com