From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Poetzl Subject: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:16:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20061121181655.GA14656@MAIL.13thfloor.at> References: <4563007B.9010202@fr.ibm.com> <4563046B.6040909@sw.ru> <45633EDF.3050309@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kirill Korotaev , Cedric Le Goater , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , Dmitry Mishin , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from MAIL.13thfloor.at ([213.145.232.33]:11413 "EHLO MAIL.13thfloor.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031201AbWKUSQ4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:16:56 -0500 To: Daniel Lezcano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45633EDF.3050309@fr.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 07:01:03PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Kirill Korotaev wrote: > >Cedric, > > > >Dmitry Mishin and Daniel Lezcano are working together on the full > >network namespace incorporating both needs of OpenVZ and VServer/IBM. > > > >Thanks, > >Kirill > > Kirill, > > We will need this framework to move the network isolation code to the > ns_proxy/net_namespace structure. So if Cedric gives us a empty > framework it is fine, except if someone does not agree with it... no problem here, but I think we will need another one, or some smart way to do the network isolation (layer 3) for the network namespace (as alternative to the layer 2 approach) ... as they are both complementary in some way, I'm not sure a single space will suffice ... best, Herbert > -- Daniel.