From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Buesch Subject: Re: ar5k and Atheros AR5005G Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:45:08 +0100 Message-ID: <200611282145.08423.mb@bu3sch.de> References: <1164746352.31456.22.camel@systems03.lan.brontes3d.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, madwifi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: To: Daniel Drake In-Reply-To: <1164746352.31456.22.camel@systems03.lan.brontes3d.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: madwifi-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: madwifi-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 28 November 2006 21:39, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in porting the ar5k driver to Linux after the recent SFLC > conclusions on the legal status. However, the hardware I have here > appears to be unsupported by ar5k: > > 01:04.0 0200: 168c:001a (rev 01) > Subsystem: 168c:2052 > > 01:04.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5005G > 802.11abg NIC (rev 01) > Subsystem: Atheros Communications, Inc. Unknown device 2052 > Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 168, IRQ 66 > Memory at c0100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] > Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2 > > It is a mini-PCI card. > > Does anyone know how much work would be needed for the ar5k codebase to > support this hardware? I started to port this at http://bu3sch.de/ath/atheros.git/ I dunno how hard it is to add hw support. -- Greetings Michael. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV