* RFC: removing the dgrs net driver
@ 2006-12-02 17:19 Adrian Bunk
2006-12-02 17:31 ` Alan
2006-12-02 17:31 ` maximilian attems
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2006-12-02 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, netdev; +Cc: Nathanael Nerode, Andres Salomon
Based on the information in the email forwarded below I'd remove the
dgrs net driver (this wasn't the first driver shipped with the kernel
without any hardware ever produced...).
Is this OK or is there any doubt whether this information is true?
cu
Adrian
----- Forwarded message from Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm> -----
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:00:12 -0400
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Please remove useless dgrs driver
An official email from digi.com to Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
explained:
Dear Andres:
After further research, we found that this product was killed in place
and never reached the market. We would like to request that this not be
included.
Copy at http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing (this was discovered
during research into firmware licensing).
The drgs driver is useless (no hardware to drive) and should be removed.
The files which should be deleted from the tree are:
drivers/net/dgrs.c
drivers/net/dgrs.h
drivers/net/dgrs_es4h.h
drivers/net/dgrs_plx9060.h
drivers/net/dgrs_i82596.h
drivers/net/dgrs_ether.h
drivers/net/dgrs_asstruct.h
drivers/net/dgrs_bcomm.h
drivers/net/dgrs_firmware.c
It will probably also be necessary to delete some stuff from drivers/net/Kconfig
and drivers/net/Makefile, but I assume that this will be trivial for any
net maintainer.
Thanks in advance for doing this.
--
Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm>
"(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
----- End forwarded message -----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: RFC: removing the dgrs net driver
2006-12-02 17:19 RFC: removing the dgrs net driver Adrian Bunk
@ 2006-12-02 17:31 ` Alan
2006-12-02 17:31 ` maximilian attems
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan @ 2006-12-02 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, Nathanael Nerode, Andres Salomon
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 18:19:32 +0100
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> Based on the information in the email forwarded below I'd remove the
> dgrs net driver (this wasn't the first driver shipped with the kernel
> without any hardware ever produced...).
>
> Is this OK or is there any doubt whether this information is true?
As I understand it a small number of such devices were produced, but I
have no objection to it going away. Even if someone had such a card it
would not actually be useful any more.
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: removing the dgrs net driver
2006-12-02 17:19 RFC: removing the dgrs net driver Adrian Bunk
2006-12-02 17:31 ` Alan
@ 2006-12-02 17:31 ` maximilian attems
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: maximilian attems @ 2006-12-02 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, Nathanael Nerode, Andres Salomon
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 06:19:32PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Based on the information in the email forwarded below I'd remove the
> dgrs net driver (this wasn't the first driver shipped with the kernel
> without any hardware ever produced...).
>
> Is this OK or is there any doubt whether this information is true?
>
> cu
> Adrian
ok thanks for doing this,
as the reporter was to lazy to cook up a proper patch for that.
there is zero bug report for dgrs on the debian bts nor did i find
one in bugzilla.kernel.org. redhat guys might want to verify on their
side.
> ----- Forwarded message from Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm> -----
>
> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:00:12 -0400
> From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm>
> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Please remove useless dgrs driver
>
> An official email from digi.com to Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
> explained:
>
> Dear Andres:
>
> After further research, we found that this product was killed in place
> and never reached the market. We would like to request that this not be
> included.
>
> Copy at http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing (this was discovered
> during research into firmware licensing).
>
> The drgs driver is useless (no hardware to drive) and should be removed.
> The files which should be deleted from the tree are:
> drivers/net/dgrs.c
> drivers/net/dgrs.h
> drivers/net/dgrs_es4h.h
> drivers/net/dgrs_plx9060.h
> drivers/net/dgrs_i82596.h
> drivers/net/dgrs_ether.h
> drivers/net/dgrs_asstruct.h
> drivers/net/dgrs_bcomm.h
> drivers/net/dgrs_firmware.c
>
> It will probably also be necessary to delete some stuff from drivers/net/Kconfig
> and drivers/net/Makefile, but I assume that this will be trivial for any
> net maintainer.
>
> Thanks in advance for doing this.
>
> --
> Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm>
>
> "(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
> the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek,
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
--
maks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-12-02 17:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-02 17:19 RFC: removing the dgrs net driver Adrian Bunk
2006-12-02 17:31 ` Alan
2006-12-02 17:31 ` maximilian attems
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).