From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eugene Surovegin Subject: Re: NAPI and shared interrupt control Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:22:57 -0800 Message-ID: <20061207102257.GC19479@gate.ebshome.net> References: <20061207094502.GA19479@gate.ebshome.net> <20061207.015954.52181319.davem@davemloft.net> <20061207101555.GB19479@gate.ebshome.net> <20061207.022010.120465413.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from gate.ebshome.net ([208.106.21.240]:47974 "EHLO gate.ebshome.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031978AbWLGKW5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:22:57 -0500 To: David Miller Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061207.022010.120465413.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:20:10AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > It also just occured to me that even if you use the dummy device > approach, it's the dummy device's quota that will be used by the > generic ->poll() downcall into the driver. Yes, that's true. That's why I made this parameter Konfig-configurable. Yes, this is not as flexible as run-time configuration available for a real netdev, but better than nothing and nobody has complained yet :) -- Eugene