From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Torcz Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: Network virtualization/isolation Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:27:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20061209112734.GA4646@irc.pl> References: <453F8800.9070603@fr.ibm.com> <1165239894.3664.61.camel@localhost> <200612041900.42768.dim@openvz.org> <4576AF68.2070604@sw.ru> <20061206183036.GA16927@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20061209035002.GA11747@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Kirill Korotaev , Linux Containers , Dmitry Mishin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, hadi@cyberus.ca, Stephen Hemminger , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Return-path: Received: from nsm.pl ([195.34.211.229]:37253 "EHLO nsm.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936919AbWLIL1p (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 06:27:45 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nsm.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE60D794F for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:27:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from nsm.pl ([195.34.211.229]) by localhost (nsm.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A7k-s6JtiBX6 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:27:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from matthew.ogrody.nsm.pl (unknown [10.10.174.98]) by nsm.pl (Postfix) with SMTP id 61BC7D7951 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:27:33 +0100 (CET) To: Herbert Poetzl Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061209035002.GA11747@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 04:50:02AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:57:49PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Herbert Poetzl writes: > >=20 > > >> But, ok, it is not the real point to argue so much imho=20 > > >> and waste our time instead of doing things. >=20 > > > well, IMHO better talk (and think) first, then implement > > > something ... not the other way round, and then start > > > fixing up the mess ... > >=20 > > Well we need a bit of both. >=20 > hmm, are 'we' in a hurry here? >=20 > until recently, 'Linux' (mainline) didn't even want > to hear about OS Level virtualization, now there > is a rush to quickly get 'something' in, not knowing > or caring if it is usable at all? Maybe beacuse other Operating Systems have it? For example Solaris' Crossbow... --=20 Tomasz Torcz RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile. zdzichu@irc.-nie.spam-.pl Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuri= ev --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: gpg --search-keys Tomasz Torcz iD8DBQFFep2m10UJr+75NrkRAgvMAJ9trKuD1fLvOCxR3BQRxgX2dkieuwCfQYbg XpFjG2x6MiOClkdR25cBEkE= =8ZdI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99--