From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>, Paul Collins <paul@briny.ondioline.org>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please make CONFIG_CFG80211 harder to enable
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:27:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200612101427.20817.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hcw49rg8.fsf@briny.internal.ondioline.org>
On Sunday 10 December 2006 07:48, Paul Collins wrote:
> "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 03:48:43AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> Somebody please mark CONFIG_CFG80211 in wireless-dev.git as
> >> experimental/broken/incomplete/whatever. Not only doesn't it work, but
> >> it also breaks Wireless Extensions if enabled, even if CONFIG_D80211 is
> >> disabled.
> >>
> >> Driver developers should know that if they enable CONFIG_CFG80211 they
> >> won't be able to debug their drivers effectifely; they'll have to fix
> >> cfg80211 first.
> >
> > Perhaps you could be more specific? I'm sending this to you from a
> > box booted on the current (~1 week old) wireless-dev kernel using a
> > WEXT-configured ipw2200 device.
> >
> > What problems are you experiencing? CFG80211 shouldn't interfere w/
> > WEXT if a driver doesn't support it.
>
> I think I hit this too when I started playing with wireless-dev a week
> or so ago. I had CFG80211 enabled and iwconfig reported "wireless
Ehm, guys?
cfg80211 is not usable in its current form because there isn't
even a damn userspace tool to interact with nl80211.
So why don't you just disable the option for the time being? That's
not too hard, I guess, and it magically fixes _all_ of your problems.
Another optional possibility would be to _implement_ the cfg80211
in d80211 and the standalone drivers, so at least the compatibility
layer works.
Come on guys, get your hands dirty instead of talking bullshit about
development code.
--
Greetings Michael.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-10 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-09 8:48 Please make CONFIG_CFG80211 harder to enable Pavel Roskin
2006-12-09 16:06 ` John W. Linville
2006-12-10 6:48 ` Paul Collins
2006-12-10 8:12 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-12-10 13:17 ` Johannes Berg
2006-12-10 16:08 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-12-10 16:21 ` [PATCH] fix cfg80211 WE compat code Johannes Berg
2006-12-22 2:53 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-12-22 5:30 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-12-22 11:04 ` Johannes Berg
2006-12-10 13:27 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200612101427.20817.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@briny.ondioline.org \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).