From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:40:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061220164054.GA27938@dspnet.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1166628858.3365.1425.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 04:34:17PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 5 seconds is unfair and unrealistic though. The *hardware* negotiation
> before link is seen can easily take upto 45 seconds already.
> That's a network topology/hardware issue (spanning tree fun) that
> software or even the hardware in your PC can do nothing about.
It's about ergonomics, not technical capabilities or fairness.
> this means that the "power up time" needs to be at least 45 seconds, if
> it's then down 5 seconds inbetween... that's not real power savings.
Then that means you can't have usable autodetection and power savings
at the same time. That's a pefectly acceptable answer, you just have
to give the choice between the two to the user. From the kernel
p.o.v, it just means that you probably need 3 modes:
1- active and exchanging packets
2- inactive but waiting for plugging and able to tell something is
going on fast (like 0.5s fast)
3- powered off
and they probably already exist (UP+addr/procmisc. set, UP and DOWN).
And if the second mode can't be lower power than the first, that's
just life. An hypothetical mode 4 identical to 2 without the "fast"
part is just not worth bothering with.
OG.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-20 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20061219185223.GA13256@srcf.ucam.org>
[not found] ` <200612191959.43019.david-b@pacbell.net>
[not found] ` <20061220042648.GA19814@srcf.ucam.org>
[not found] ` <200612192114.49920.david-b@pacbell.net>
[not found] ` <20061220053417.GA29877@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20061220055209.GA20483@srcf.ucam.org>
[not found] ` <1166601025.3365.1345.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
2006-12-20 12:53 ` Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down Matthew Garrett
2006-12-20 13:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-20 14:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-12-20 15:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-20 22:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-12-20 23:37 ` Rick Jones
2006-12-19 23:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-12-21 0:11 ` Francois Romieu
2006-12-20 0:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-12-21 11:18 ` Francois Romieu
2006-12-21 1:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-12-21 2:05 ` Michael Wu
2006-12-21 2:18 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-12-21 2:38 ` Daniel Drake
2006-12-21 2:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-12-21 3:08 ` Daniel Drake
2006-12-21 3:25 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-12-21 3:37 ` Dan Williams
2006-12-21 3:29 ` Dan Williams
2006-12-21 3:14 ` Dan Williams
2006-12-21 13:14 ` jamal
2006-12-21 2:29 ` Daniel Drake
2006-12-21 2:10 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-12-21 8:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-22 1:03 ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-23 8:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-20 15:27 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-12-20 15:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-20 16:40 ` Olivier Galibert [this message]
2006-12-20 17:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-20 20:40 ` Benny Amorsen
2006-12-20 21:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-20 21:15 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-20 14:00 ` Jiri Benc
2006-12-20 18:12 ` Dan Williams
2006-12-21 1:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-12-21 1:57 ` Michael Wu
2006-12-21 2:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-12-21 3:02 ` Dan Williams
2006-12-21 3:06 ` Dan Williams
2006-12-21 3:14 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-12-21 3:32 ` Dan Williams
2006-12-21 13:19 ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2006-12-21 17:16 ` Dan Williams
2006-12-21 18:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-12-22 1:25 ` Matt Domsch
2006-12-20 16:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-12-21 5:25 David Brownell
2006-12-21 7:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-12-21 8:11 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061220164054.GA27938@dspnet.fr.eu.org \
--to=galibert@pobox.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).