From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:20:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20061221022053.GB723@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20061219185223.GA13256@srcf.ucam.org> <1166638371.2798.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061221011526.GB32625@srcf.ucam.org> <200612202057.09545.flamingice@sourmilk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Dan Williams , Jiri Benc , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:46325 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161144AbWLUCVJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:21:09 -0500 To: Michael Wu Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612202057.09545.flamingice@sourmilk.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 08:57:05PM -0500, Michael Wu wrote: (allowing scanning while the interface is down) > No, it's absolutely a bug. It just so happens that some drivers incorrectly > allowed it. Ok. Would it be reasonable to add warnings to any devices that allow it? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org