netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tcp: fix ambiguity in the `before' relation
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:42:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200612211442.38493@strip-the-willow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061220.103112.85414445.davem@davemloft.net>

Hi David,

many thanks for taking the matter seriously and investigating
it further. 

|  I went over this patch and analysis a dozen times, because I
|  couldn't believe something like this has been broken for
|  so long :-)
It gave me some grief too, when I looked at DCCP sequence numbers %-)
RFC 1982 provides some definitions, but leaves the case a = (b + 2^31) % 2^32
open to the implementation (suggests `undefined').

I think the new definition is more conformant with RFC 1982 than the old one,
since the ambiguity is now removed with regard to a = (b + 2^31) % 32, and it
is not "unnecessarily burdensome to implement" (section 3.2 of RFC 1982).
  
|  Even BSD suffers of this issue, since the beginning.  See
|  SEQ_LT() in tcp_seq.h, and it seems that BSD's timestamp
|  sequence checking has the issue too (see TSTMP_LT() macro
|  in OpenBSD's tcp_input.c)
I didn't know about OpenBSD, but in Stevens vol 2 (sec. 24.7) it is
already defined in this way. 

Best regards & merry Christmas
Gerrit

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-21 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-14 15:07 [PATCH][RFC] tcp: fix ambiguity in the `before' relation Gerrit Renker
2006-12-20 18:31 ` David Miller
2006-12-21 14:42   ` Gerrit Renker [this message]
2006-12-22  0:53   ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-03  8:56     ` Gerrit Renker
2007-01-04  0:15       ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 12:49         ` Gerrit Renker
2007-01-05  3:59           ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:51             ` Gerrit Renker
2007-01-05 12:01               ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 12:49                 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-01-05 20:34                   ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-08  8:58                     ` Gerrit Renker
2006-12-20 20:01 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200612211442.38493@strip-the-willow \
    --to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).