From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivo van Doorn Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: Add write support Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:54:06 +0100 Message-ID: <200612211954.08123.IvDoorn@gmail.com> References: <200612131956.51000.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20061213190651.GF26412@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Lennart Sorensen" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Michael Wu" Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:41200 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423012AbWLUSyh (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:54:37 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so3143083nfa for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:54:35 -0800 (PST) To: "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi, > > This patch addes support for writing to the eeprom, > > this also moves some duplicate code into seperate functions. > > John: Do you want me to merge this path with the eeprom merge patch, > and move the patch that moves rt2x00 to use this eeprom module into a > separate patch or all these 2 patches good enough? I shouldn't write mails while tired. Let met explain myself. ;) eeprom_93cx6 has now 2 patches pending: 1 - move eeprom_93cx6 out of rt2x00 and into /lib 2 - add write support for eeprom_93cx6 Should patch 1 be split into a patch to add eeprom_93cx6 to the /lib folder and a seperate patch to remove the module from rt2x00? And while redoing the patch, merge patch 2 with the patch to add eeprom_93cx6 to /lib? Ivo