From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: d80211: How does TX flow control work?
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:52:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070103185203.2754e059@griffin.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <459A5945.80909@web.de>
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:08:21 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> What I (think to) understand is that a low-level drivers call
> ieee80211_stop_queue() if they run out of buffers. That flips a
> per-queue bit (IEEE80211_LINK_STATE_XOFF), prevents that any further
> frame is passed to the low-level TX routine,
Correct.
> and can cause that up to
> *one* packet per queue is stored in
> ieee80211_local::pending_packets[queue].
This is needed due to fragmented frames. After resume, passing of
fragments to the driver has to continue where it was stopped. Returning
the half-sent fragmented frame to the 802.11 qdisc wasn't possible
until recently (I think the conversion of master interface to native
802.11 type could allow that now - but it's probably not worth the
effort).
> But it looks to me like nothing
> prevents ieee80211_tx() being invoked even in case that there is already
> some stuff in that single-packet storage.
The 802.11 qdisc (see wme_qdiscop_dequeue) takes care of that.
> That in turn triggers WARN_ONs in ieee80211_tx() under high load for me
> (with rt2500usb). And it should also cause orphaned skbs because the
> storage is overwritten in that case. Either I'm blind or something is
> fishy...
You are most likely hitting some bug. Could you post more information
please?
Thanks,
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-03 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-02 13:08 d80211: How does TX flow control work? Jan Kiszka
2007-01-03 17:52 ` Jiri Benc [this message]
2007-01-03 18:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-01-03 18:18 ` Jiri Benc
2007-01-03 18:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-01-07 0:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-01-08 20:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-01-10 18:20 ` Jiri Benc
2007-01-10 18:29 ` Simon Barber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070103185203.2754e059@griffin.suse.cz \
--to=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).