From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivo van Doorn Subject: [PATCH RESEND 0/4] Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 21:29:34 +0100 Message-ID: <200701032129.34879.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]:55122 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932080AbXACUaH (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:30:07 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so7801012nfa for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:30:05 -0800 (PST) To: "John W. Linville" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi John, These patches have been send during 2006 but never have been applied or rejected. Even after sending requests for updates on these patches. So I have no idea if you had rejected them, simply overlooked them, or if they are still in your pending list. Short summary of which patches are being resend: - crc-itu-t This has been send to the list during the summer around the same time as the initial patch for rfkill. It had also been send to the linux-kernel list with a CC to you with a request for comment. - eeprom_93cx6 This has been send to the list1 or 2 months ago. After the initial patch a feature request for eeprom write support was made. Those 2 patches have now been merged into a single patch. Both of the libraries come from rt2x00, and this patch merely moves them to the location for more generic routines. Both the crc as the eeprom handling can be used by different drivers (some drivers also use the same implementation, which in my opinion would jusitify these 2 modules to be in the lib folder). Ivo