From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
dlstevens@us.ibm.com, greearb@candelatech.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:19:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070105111910.GA3650@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070105093846.GA21000@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 08:38:47PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:38:44AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > I'd only suggest to change "goto out;" to
> > "return NULL;" at the end of inetdev_init because
> > now RCU is engaged unnecessarily.
>
> I agree. The RCU assignment should come before the out label.
> Can you send a patch?
Why me? (I didn't spoil this!)
Cheers,
Jarek P.
PS: should be applied after David's Stevens patch from 2007.01.04
---
Subject: [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment
inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment
(final suggestion by Herbert Xu)
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
---
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.20-rc3-/net/ipv4/devinet.c linux-2.6.20-rc3/net/ipv4/devinet.c
--- linux-2.6.20-rc3-/net/ipv4/devinet.c 2007-01-05 11:53:16.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc3/net/ipv4/devinet.c 2007-01-05 11:55:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -174,9 +174,10 @@ struct in_device *inetdev_init(struct ne
ip_mc_init_dev(in_dev);
if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
ip_mc_up(in_dev);
-out:
+
/* we can receive as soon as ip_ptr is set -- do this last */
rcu_assign_pointer(dev->ip_ptr, in_dev);
+out:
return in_dev;
out_kfree:
kfree(in_dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-05 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 2:13 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2006-12-22 7:13 ` [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!) Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 7:42 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 13:47 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-22 14:05 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-27 8:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-27 16:16 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-28 12:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-29 11:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 9:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 11:16 ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-22 12:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 5:00 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-02 7:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 8:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 9:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 23:35 ` David Stevens
2007-01-02 23:43 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 8:07 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 8:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 16:53 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 22:14 ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:13 ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:35 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 23:56 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 0:30 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 1:02 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-04 1:14 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 5:41 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 5:34 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 6:26 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 8:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 8:29 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 8:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 10:27 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 11:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 17:04 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-05 13:55 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-01-05 6:38 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05 9:38 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:19 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-01-05 11:23 ` [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-09 22:38 ` David Miller
2007-01-05 19:52 ` David Stevens
2007-01-05 20:33 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-05 20:34 ` David Miller
2007-01-08 6:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-08 16:57 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-08 18:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-09 8:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 9:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 12:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 20:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-11 7:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 7:40 ` David Miller
2007-01-11 8:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 8:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 8:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 9:27 ` David Miller
2007-01-11 11:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 17:42 ` RCU info Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-12 12:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070105111910.GA3650@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).