netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	dlstevens@us.ibm.com, greearb@candelatech.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:19:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070105111910.GA3650@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070105093846.GA21000@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 08:38:47PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:38:44AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > 
> > I'd only suggest to change "goto out;" to
> > "return NULL;" at the end of inetdev_init because
> > now RCU is engaged unnecessarily.
> 
> I agree.  The RCU assignment should come before the out label.
> Can you send a patch?

Why me? (I didn't spoil this!)

Cheers,
Jarek P.

PS: should be applied after David's Stevens patch from 2007.01.04
---

Subject: [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment

inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment
(final suggestion by Herbert Xu)

Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>

---

diff -Nurp linux-2.6.20-rc3-/net/ipv4/devinet.c linux-2.6.20-rc3/net/ipv4/devinet.c
--- linux-2.6.20-rc3-/net/ipv4/devinet.c	2007-01-05 11:53:16.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc3/net/ipv4/devinet.c	2007-01-05 11:55:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -174,9 +174,10 @@ struct in_device *inetdev_init(struct ne
 	ip_mc_init_dev(in_dev);
 	if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
 		ip_mc_up(in_dev);
-out:
+
 	/* we can receive as soon as ip_ptr is set -- do this last */
 	rcu_assign_pointer(dev->ip_ptr, in_dev);
+out:
 	return in_dev;
 out_kfree:
 	kfree(in_dev);

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-05 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-20  2:13 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2006-12-22  7:13 ` [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!) Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22  7:42   ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 13:47     ` Ben Greear
2006-12-22 14:05     ` Ben Greear
2006-12-27  8:24       ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-27 16:16         ` Ben Greear
2006-12-28 12:56           ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-29 11:16           ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22  9:48   ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 11:16   ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-22 12:53     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02  5:00 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-02  7:39   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02  8:23     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02  9:23       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 23:35   ` David Stevens
2007-01-02 23:43     ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03  8:07     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03  8:28       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 16:53         ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 22:14   ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:13     ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:35       ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 23:56         ` David Stevens
2007-01-04  0:30       ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04  1:02         ` Ben Greear
2007-01-04  1:14           ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04  5:41           ` David Stevens
2007-01-04  5:34         ` David Stevens
2007-01-04  6:26           ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04  8:03             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04  8:29               ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04  8:50                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 10:27                   ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 11:04                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 17:04                       ` Ben Greear
2007-01-05 13:55                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 20:33             ` David Miller
2007-01-05  6:38               ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05  9:38                 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:19                   ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-01-05 11:23                     ` [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:37                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-09 22:38                       ` David Miller
2007-01-05 19:52                     ` David Stevens
2007-01-05 20:33               ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-05 20:34                 ` David Miller
2007-01-08  6:53                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-08 16:57                   ` Ben Greear
2007-01-08 18:03                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-09  8:10                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10  9:04                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 12:50                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 20:01                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-11  7:24                               ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11  7:40                                 ` David Miller
2007-01-11  8:29                                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11  8:35                                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11  8:39                                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11  9:27                                         ` David Miller
2007-01-11 11:09                                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 17:42                                             ` RCU info Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-12 12:19                                               ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070105111910.GA3650@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).