From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: kernel BUG in eth_alloc_tx_desc_index at drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c:1069! Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:02:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20070109130220.GA4060@ff.dom.local> References: <7d01f9f00701051103q3ee6ed35q9fd0f778a18061b8@mail.gmail.com> <20070109092602.GC1703@ff.dom.local> <7d01f9f00701090227v60b37e5dy6afbf70ccde58bf2@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx10.go2.pl ([193.17.41.74]:58487 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751384AbXAINA2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:00:28 -0500 To: Thibaut VARENE Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7d01f9f00701090227v60b37e5dy6afbf70ccde58bf2@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: ... > I suspected both and changed both the disk and the ram for quality > parts, that I tested afterwards. Both passed thorough tests. > > Finally, using the other NIC on the box (a VIA Rhine II, 100Mbps), > works absolutely fine. If you are not tired, I'd suggest two more tests: - as above but with NIC set to 100Mbps also, - long downloading but without nfs e.g. ftp (btw. there were some patches after 2.6.19 for rpc memory races). Jarek P. PS: Maintainers were cc-ed, I hope?