From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [PATCH] INET: fix incorrect "inet_sock->is_icsk" assignment Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:13:57 -0500 Message-ID: <200701100813.57939.paul.moore@hp.com> References: <20070108132548.GA2324@ff.dom.local> <200701090926.47206.paul.moore@hp.com> <20070110100145.GA2611@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mailhub.hp.com ([192.151.27.10]:38151 "EHLO mailhub.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932799AbXAJNOG (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:14:06 -0500 To: Jarek Poplawski In-Reply-To: <20070110100145.GA2611@ff.dom.local> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 10 January 2007 5:01 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:26:46AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 3:43 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > ... But if you consider this code will probably become classical > > > and will be read, quoted and teached next 1000 years, then the style > > > could matter... > > > > This from the guy who believes "Justin Timberlake rocks!" ;) > > > > All right, you convinced me, I'll send out a patch to the patch later > > today. > > I'm terribly sorry, I didn't expected any messing now! > I rather thought about some preferences for the future. No need to apologize, it was a trivial fix and I figured I might as well take care of now ... however, some of your taste in music does require an apology ;) -- paul moore linux security @ hp