From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [take32 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:14:09 +0300 Message-ID: <20070110121409.GA28862@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <11684170003907@2ka.mipt.ru> <45A4C9DE.8020605@garzik.org> <20070110113051.GA4950@2ka.mipt.ru> <45A4D478.2030200@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: David Miller , Ulrich Drepper , Andrew Morton , netdev , Zach Brown , Christoph Hellwig , Chase Venters , Johann Borck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim , Ingo Molnar , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:54073 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932774AbXAJMQt (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:16:49 -0500 To: Jeff Garzik Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A4D478.2030200@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:56:40AM -0500, Jeff Garzik (jeff@garzik.org) wrote: > >It was there, but Andrew dropped it somewhere about take25 :) > > Probably because it was a moving target with a high rate of change, > requiring time that Andrew did not have just to keep in sync and fix > build conflicts with other -mm patches. Ok, I understood. Let's freeze kevent for a while and allow things to settle down, but... How can I detect that it is in use, since I get no feedback? I suppose that if Andrew will not pick it up, I will resend/push/pull the latest set, but without new features implemented (or as addon), only bugfixes. > Jeff > -- Evgeniy Polyakov