From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, dlstevens@us.ibm.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:50:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070110125048.GB2611@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070110090411.GA1589@ff.dom.local>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:04:11AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> It looks like you're talking about the right thing
> and I'm a fool again! Now I try to find why I even
> had to pay for this. I read again and again adequate
> chapters from R. Love and C. Benvenuti's books, see
> a lot about kernel preemption in 2.6, but can't see
> anything about preemption disabled in ioctls - maybe
> I'm blind or they are badly translated. Now I look
> into "Linux Device Drivers", see ch. 6 about ioctls,
> blocking I/O and RCU, but nothing about preemption
> disabled again. Maybe this is omited because it's
> obvious to people who started hacking with earlier
> kernels?
... or maybe it's even more complicated...
For the time being, I revoke my critique of these books.
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-10 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 2:13 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2006-12-22 7:13 ` [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!) Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 7:42 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 13:47 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-22 14:05 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-27 8:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-27 16:16 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-28 12:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-29 11:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 9:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 11:16 ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-22 12:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 5:00 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-02 7:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 8:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 9:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 23:35 ` David Stevens
2007-01-02 23:43 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 8:07 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 8:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 16:53 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 22:14 ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:13 ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:35 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 23:56 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 0:30 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 1:02 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-04 1:14 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 5:41 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 5:34 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 6:26 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 8:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 8:29 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 8:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 10:27 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 11:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 17:04 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-05 13:55 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-01-05 6:38 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05 9:38 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:19 ` [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05 11:23 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-09 22:38 ` David Miller
2007-01-05 19:52 ` David Stevens
2007-01-05 20:33 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-05 20:34 ` David Miller
2007-01-08 6:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-08 16:57 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-08 18:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-09 8:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 9:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 12:50 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-01-10 20:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-11 7:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 7:40 ` David Miller
2007-01-11 8:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 8:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 8:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 9:27 ` David Miller
2007-01-11 11:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 17:42 ` RCU info Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-12 12:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070110125048.GB2611@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).