From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivo van Doorn Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/4] Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:41:07 +0100 Message-ID: <200701201241.07472.IvDoorn@gmail.com> References: <200701032129.34879.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]:37302 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965256AbXATLlN (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:41:13 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so741732nfa for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:41:12 -0800 (PST) To: "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <200701032129.34879.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi John, > These patches have been send during 2006 but never > have been applied or rejected. Even after sending requests > for updates on these patches. > So I have no idea if you had rejected them, simply > overlooked them, or if they are still in your pending list. > > Short summary of which patches are being resend: > > - crc-itu-t > This has been send to the list during the summer around > the same time as the initial patch for rfkill. It had also been > send to the linux-kernel list with a CC to you with a request > for comment. > > - eeprom_93cx6 > This has been send to the list1 or 2 months ago. After the > initial patch a feature request for eeprom write support was > made. Those 2 patches have now been merged into a single patch. > > Both of the libraries come from rt2x00, and this patch merely > moves them to the location for more generic routines. > Both the crc as the eeprom handling can be used by different > drivers (some drivers also use the same implementation, which > in my opinion would jusitify these 2 modules to be in the lib folder). Do you have any status update for these 4 patches? Are they pending, or have they been rejected? Thanks, Ivo