From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp_output: Re: rare bad TCP checksum with 2.6.19? Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:13:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20070122071303.GB1634@ff.dom.local> References: <20070119110641.GA3135@ff.dom.local> <45B0C581.1020805@tls.msk.ru> <20070119140820.GA3424@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy , Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mx10.go2.pl ([193.17.41.74]:36939 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751867AbXAVHKm (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:10:42 -0500 To: Michael Tokarev Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070119140820.GA3424@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:08:20PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > You are welcome! But you probably didn't read this with > attention: if it works, you should thank mainly to that > other guy... > > Btw. I can't remember I've seen such ferocious testing > ever! After checking in the dictionary I found my btw. could be rather confusing: > ferocious: > 1.savagely fierce, as a wild beast, person, action, > or aspect; violently cruel: a ferocious beating. > 2.extreme or intense: a ferocious thirst. I've only meant #2 - and nothing like #1. If you were confused - sorry! Jarek P.