From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp_output: Re: rare bad TCP checksum with 2.6.19? Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:48:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20070122084856.GB2079@ff.dom.local> References: <45AE2EDF.4060709@tls.msk.ru> <20070119110641.GA3135@ff.dom.local> <20070119211027.GA16626@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070122065214.GA1634@ff.dom.local> <20070122074557.GA15461@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michael Tokarev , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy , "David S\. Miller" Return-path: Received: from mx10.go2.pl ([193.17.41.74]:60177 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750791AbXAVIqf (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:46:35 -0500 To: Herbert Xu Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070122074557.GA15461@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 06:45:57PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 07:52:14AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > > I was so impressed by the amount of work done by Michael > > that I magnified his merit and forgot to mention the role > > of Patrick and Herbert, particularly here: > > You don't need to be so modest! > > While no doubt Patrick helped in tracking this down, my role in > this thread is solely in adding this bug in the first place :) Let's be sincere then: I really spend more time on thinking why, with this hint of yours and the last summary of Michael, you didn't send this patch yet, and checking if I don't repeat or appropriate your work, then on finding the place. My only explanation was: you were overworked with something else and I'm sure you think the same, now. Jarek P. PS: considering the amount of diplomacy relative to the size of the patch, I think we would better stop amuse this list here.