From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP: Replace __kfree_skb() with kfree_skb() Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:05:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20070126140533.GA3158@ff.dom.local> References: <45B97763.8000305@ncos.nec.co.jp> <20070126082838.GA1639@ff.dom.local> <20070126091606.GA23469@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070126094950.GB1639@ff.dom.local> <20070126095251.GA24204@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070126101838.GC1639@ff.dom.local> <20070126104518.GA24490@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070126110235.GD1639@ff.dom.local> <20070126131808.GE1639@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Masayuki Nakagawa , davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, mhuth@mvista.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kuznetsov To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mx2.go2.pl ([193.17.41.42]:52483 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965688AbXAZODF (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:03:05 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070126131808.GE1639@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:18:08PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > I've only now read the original thread of this problem > and this long note about security. I need more time to > understand this, but now I'm not sure Masayuki's server > isn't doing something against the policy of this note This would be socket case then (not server), sorry. Jarek P.