From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP: Replace __kfree_skb() with kfree_skb() Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:38:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20070129103808.GB1652@ff.dom.local> References: <45B97763.8000305@ncos.nec.co.jp> <20070126082838.GA1639@ff.dom.local> <20070126091606.GA23469@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070126094950.GB1639@ff.dom.local> <20070126095251.GA24204@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070126101838.GC1639@ff.dom.local> <20070126104518.GA24490@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070129082616.GA1652@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Masayuki Nakagawa , davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, mhuth@mvista.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kuznetsov To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mx10.go2.pl ([193.17.41.74]:43033 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752556AbXA2Kfo (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:35:44 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070129082616.GA1652@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:26:16AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > So this patch is changing it to ipv6 way. It seems to > be quite brave. I think there was some reason to do > this "old way" and I hope consequences were analyzed. ... But since Alexey Kuznetsov accepted this change too, they surely were. Let's forget about my doubts. Sorry for disturbing, Jarek P.