From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Runtime power management on ipw2100 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:27:45 +0000 Message-ID: <20070131102744.GA24424@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20070131075249.GA22115@srcf.ucam.org> <1170234787.6746.22.camel@amit-laptop> <20070131094858.GA23842@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Amit Kucheria To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipw2100-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: ipw2100-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Matthew Garrett writes: > > > > PCI seems to require a delay of 10ms when sequencing from D3 to D0, > > which probably isn't acceptable latency for an "up" state. > > It might be if the interface has been idle for some time > (and the delay is not busy looping of course) Hm. How would this interact with receiving packets? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV