From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][NET_SCHED] sch_prio: class statistics printing enabled
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:17:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070131151721.GA3811@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45C0B05D.3020101@trash.net>
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 04:06:05PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >>From sch_api.c:
> >
> >
> >> if (cl_ops->dump && cl_ops->dump(q, cl, skb, tcm) < 0)
> >> goto rtattr_failure;
> >>
> >> if (gnet_stats_start_copy_compat(skb, TCA_STATS2, TCA_STATS,
> >> TCA_XSTATS, q->stats_lock, &d) < 0)
> >> goto rtattr_failure;
> >>
> >> if (cl_ops->dump_stats && cl_ops->dump_stats(q, cl, &d) < 0)
> >> goto rtattr_failure;
> >
> >
> > I can't see any difference between calling ->dump and
> > ->dump_stats? Of course we may forsee this error should
> > jump over cl_ops...
>
>
> Why should there be a difference?
>
> The class passed to both ->dump and ->dump_stats is not a classid but
> a qdisc-internal identifier (pointer, integer, whatever) which comes
> from either ->get or ->walk, and thus is valid unless these functions
> have bugs. Your check would cover the bug up and has no other purpose.
Maybe I miss something, but it's not "my check". I tried
only to "stay in line with the remaining file"...
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-31 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-31 7:53 [PATCH][NET_SCHED] sch_prio: class statistics printing enabled Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 13:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 14:31 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 14:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 14:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 14:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 15:01 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 15:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 15:17 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-01-31 15:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 15:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 15:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 20:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070131151721.GA3811@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).