netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][NET_SCHED] sch_prio: class statistics printing enabled
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:17:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070131151721.GA3811@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45C0B05D.3020101@trash.net>

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 04:06:05PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >>From sch_api.c:
> > 
> > 
> >>       if (cl_ops->dump && cl_ops->dump(q, cl, skb, tcm) < 0)
> >>               goto rtattr_failure;
> >>
> >>       if (gnet_stats_start_copy_compat(skb, TCA_STATS2, TCA_STATS,
> >>                       TCA_XSTATS, q->stats_lock, &d) < 0)
> >>               goto rtattr_failure;
> >>
> >>       if (cl_ops->dump_stats && cl_ops->dump_stats(q, cl, &d) < 0)
> >>               goto rtattr_failure;
> > 
> > 
> > I can't see any difference between calling ->dump and
> > ->dump_stats? Of course we may forsee this error should
> > jump over cl_ops...
> 
> 
> Why should there be a difference?
> 
> The class passed to both ->dump and ->dump_stats is not a classid but
> a qdisc-internal identifier (pointer, integer, whatever) which comes
> from either ->get or ->walk, and thus is valid unless these functions
> have bugs. Your check would cover the bug up and has no other purpose.

Maybe I miss something, but it's not "my check". I tried
only to "stay in line with the remaining file"...

Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-31 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-31  7:53 [PATCH][NET_SCHED] sch_prio: class statistics printing enabled Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 13:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 14:31   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 14:35     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 14:35   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 14:37     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 15:01       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 15:06         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 15:17           ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-01-31 15:23             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 15:22       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-31 15:23         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-31 20:21           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070131151721.GA3811@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).