Re: [PATCH 2/3] Seperate DSACK from SACK fast path

[David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>]

From: Baruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:41:21 +0200

> Move DSACK code outside the SACK fast-path checking code. If the DSACK
> determined that the information was too old we stayed with a partial cache
> copied. Most likely this matters very little since the next packet will not be
> DSACK and we will find it in the cache. but it's still not good form and there
> is little reason to couple the two checks.
> 
> Since the SACK receive cache doesn't need the data to be in host order we also
> remove the ntohl in the checking loop.
> 
> Signed-Off-By: Baruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>

Thanks for fixing up the endianness annotations, applied.