From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Pavlic Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [S390]: Introduction of AF_IUCV sockets support Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:15:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20070209191533.GA25570@de.ibm.com> References: <20070202120528.GA10392@de.ibm.com> <20070208.140022.45514241.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mtagate1.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.134]:1231 "EHLO mtagate1.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992767AbXBITQZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:16:25 -0500 Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate1.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l19JGOxQ057208 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:16:24 GMT Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.212]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.2) with ESMTP id l19JGOKS1900726 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:16:24 GMT Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l19JGNEq005137 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:16:23 GMT Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070208.140022.45514241.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:00:22PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Frank Pavlic > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:05:28 +0100 > > > The patch set consists of following patches: > > > > [1/7] [S390]: Rewrite of the IUCV base code, part 1 > > [2/7] [S390]: Rewrite of the IUCV base code, part 2 > > [3/7] [S390]: Adapt monreader driver to new IUCV API > > [4/7] [S390]: Adapt vmlogrdr driver to new IUCV API > > [5/7] [S390]: Adapt netiucv driver to new IUCV API > > [6/7] [S390]: Adapt special message interface to new IUCV API > > [7/7] [S390]: Add AF_IUCV socket support > > I've applied all of this, although some of the driver > conversions (notable, patches #5 and #6) didn't apply > cleanly so I applied them by hand. Thanks for this , I figured that out today by myself and started to make a new set of patches. You saved me a lot of time and work once again ;-) > > Watch out for any fallout from this when Linus pulls > these changes in. > > Thanks. I'll do so ...