From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Buesch Subject: Re: The new SSB subsystem for bcm43xx (and others) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:03:57 +0100 Message-ID: <200702102203.57411.mb@bu3sch.de> References: <200612221359.25093.mb@bu3sch.de> <20070210204630.GA27274@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau To: Matthew Garrett Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:34736 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751879AbXBJVEK (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:04:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20070210204630.GA27274@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Saturday 10 February 2007 21:46, Matthew Garrett wrote: > I'm testing with your bcm43xx git tree, which I'm guessing is the > current ssb code. The only problem I've found is that there doesn't seem > to be any sysfs relationship between the ssb bus and (in this case) the > PCI device that it's associated with. Is this fixable? Right now it > appears as an entirely separate branch of the device tree, which doesn't > seem quite right. I guess that's fixable, but I didn't care too much, yet. -- Greetings Michael.