From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz, baruch@ev-en.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] tcp: remove experimental variants from default list
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:34:43 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070212.123443.85409558.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070212122634.07b3303b@freekitty>
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:26:34 -0800
> No magic paper. But the impression from multiple talks is that Cubic
> is still doing fine. Also for non high speed flows, it really doesn't matter
> because all the loss based congestion controls behave the same.
This last point is important.
Either it's high BDP and it uses the new stuff (and we WANT it to)
or it's not high BDP and it USES RENO!
That's why Baruch's email is totally illogical.
If people don't have high BDP, these algorithms such as CUBIC and BIC
change nothing compared to Reno, they purposely behave precisely the
same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-12 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-12 16:03 [patch 0/3] TCP trivial patches Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-12 16:03 ` [patch 1/3] tcp: cleanup of htcp Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-12 21:14 ` David Miller
2007-02-12 21:28 ` [patch 1/3] tcp: cleanup of htcp (resend) Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-12 21:34 ` David Miller
2007-02-12 16:03 ` [patch 2/3] tcp: use read mostly for CUBIC parameters Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-12 21:15 ` David Miller
2007-02-12 16:03 ` [patch 3/3] tcp: remove experimental variants from default list Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-12 19:11 ` Baruch Even
2007-02-12 20:13 ` Ian McDonald
2007-02-12 20:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-12 20:34 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-02-12 20:32 ` David Miller
2007-02-12 20:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-12 20:47 ` David Miller
2007-02-12 21:05 ` Ian McDonald
2007-02-12 20:20 ` David Miller
2007-02-12 22:12 ` Baruch Even
2007-02-12 22:53 ` David Miller
2007-02-13 9:56 ` Baruch Even
2007-02-13 16:49 ` SANGTAE HA
2007-02-13 17:42 ` Baruch Even
2007-02-13 19:54 ` John Heffner
2007-02-13 20:06 ` David Miller
2007-02-13 20:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-13 17:41 ` Injong Rhee
2007-02-13 18:23 ` Baruch Even
2007-02-13 19:56 ` David Miller
2007-02-13 20:06 ` Baruch Even
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070212.123443.85409558.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=baruch@ev-en.org \
--cc=ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).