netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"bugme-daemon\@kernel-bugs\.osdl\.org"
	<bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>,
	pterjan@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH][NET][BRIDGE] br_if: oops in port_carrier_check
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:26:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070213062650.GA1614@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070212094738.0a8ae896@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:47:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:28:48 +0100
> Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl> wrote:
> 
> > Here is my patch proposal for testing.
> > If it doesn't work - forget about it.
> > (Prepared with 2.6.20-git6 but could
> > be applied to 2.6.20 also.)
> > 
> > Jarek P.
> > 
> > 
> > dev_hold/dev_put added to prevent dev kfree
> > during port_carrier_check runnig, while dev
> > and port are removed.
> 
> No, holding the reference just stops the kfree, it doesn't
> stop the device from being removed from the port.

But I wrote above it is only to prevent the kfree.

>        p = dev->br_port;
>        if (!p)
>                goto done;
>        br = p->br;

Then p is NULL here and we goto done.

Sorry, but the first version was wrong (incomplete).
Below I attach a new proposal.


Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>

---

diff -Nurp linux-2.6.20-git7-/net/bridge/br_if.c linux-2.6.20-git7/net/bridge/br_if.c
--- linux-2.6.20-git7-/net/bridge/br_if.c	2007-02-12 20:27:49.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-git7/net/bridge/br_if.c	2007-02-12 20:53:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static void port_carrier_check(struct wo
 		spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
 	}
 done:
+	dev_put(dev);
 	rtnl_unlock();
 }
 
@@ -161,7 +162,8 @@ static void del_nbp(struct net_bridge_po
 
 	dev_set_promiscuity(dev, -1);
 
-	cancel_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check);
+	if (cancel_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check))
+		dev_put(dev);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
 	br_stp_disable_port(p);
@@ -444,7 +446,9 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, str
 	spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
 	br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br);
 	br_features_recompute(br);
-	schedule_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check, BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE);
+	if (schedule_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check, BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE))
+		dev_hold(dev);
+
 	spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
 
 	dev_set_mtu(br->dev, br_min_mtu(br));
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.20-git7-/net/bridge/br_notify.c linux-2.6.20-git7/net/bridge/br_notify.c
--- linux-2.6.20-git7-/net/bridge/br_notify.c	2007-02-12 20:27:49.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-git7/net/bridge/br_notify.c	2007-02-12 20:50:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -56,7 +56,9 @@ static int br_device_event(struct notifi
 
 	case NETDEV_CHANGE:
 		if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP)
-			schedule_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check, BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE);
+			if (schedule_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check,
+						BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE))
+				dev_hold(dev);
 		break;
 
 	case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-13  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-07 20:52 Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7962] New: oops in port_carrier_check Andrew Morton
2007-02-07 22:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-09  7:42   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-02-09 17:52     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-09 18:50       ` Pascal Terjan
2007-02-12  6:44       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-02-12 10:28         ` [PATCH][NET][BRIDGE] br_if: " Jarek Poplawski
2007-02-12 17:47           ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-13  6:26             ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-02-13 19:55               ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-13 20:35                 ` David Miller
2007-02-14  8:07                   ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070213062650.GA1614@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pterjan@gmail.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).