From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: FC5 iptables-restore failure Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:20:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20070215112022.GD8353@redhat.com> References: <20070215024507.8c97ee01.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:55683 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965650AbXBOLUa (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:20:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070215024507.8c97ee01.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:45:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5: > > sony:/home/akpm# service iptables stop > Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ] > Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter [ OK ] > Unloading iptables modules: [ OK ] > sony:/home/akpm# service iptables start > Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 20 failed > [FAILED] > > Dunno when it started happening, but it's in mainline now. > > It's a pretty stupid error message. line 20 of what? 2.6.18 -> 2.6.19 changes a bunch of netfilter config option names. Sure you weren't bitten by that ? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk