From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric S. Raymond" Subject: Re: Are you responsible for Fedora's ifenslave utility? Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:37:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20070216193728.GA6538@thyrsus.com> References: <20070216163505.GA5077@thyrsus.com> <20070216192455.GA26669@infradead.org> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:44013 "EHLO snark.thyrsus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946070AbXBPThg (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:37:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070216192455.GA26669@infradead.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig : > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:35:05AM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > Are you responsible for the ifenslave utility that ships with Fedora Core? > > Eric, asking on an upstream list about distribution maintainers is totally > inappropriate, so please stop it. Fedora has enough mailing lists of their > own. Don't make so many presumptions. I had to try to locate the upstream maintainers precisely because it wasn't clear whether I'm looking at a Fedora packaging problem or something further upstream. Jay Vosburgh and I are trying to detemine that now. -- Eric S. Raymond