From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: all syscalls initially taking 4usec on a P4? Re: nonblocking UDPv4 recvfrom() taking 4usec @ 3GHz?
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:02:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070220170232.GA4730@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070220164124.GA24930@2ka.mipt.ru>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 07:41:25PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> It can be recvfrom only problem - syscall overhead on my p4 (core duo,
> debian testing) is bout 300 usec - to test I ran read('dev/zero', &data,
> 0) in a loop.
nsec I assume?
The usec numbers for read(fd, &c, 0) where fd is /dev/zero:
1.557667, 0.627667, 0.447333, 0.440000, 0.440000, 0.440000, 0.442333,
0.440000, 0.440000, 0.442333, 0.442333, 0.440000, 0.440000, 0.442333,
0.442667, 0.440000, 0.440000, 0.440000, 0.442333, 0.442667,
In usecs. Notice the same declining figure, but not as pronounced. With a
sleep(1) in between, we get:
1.692667, 1.800000, 0.782667, 1.282667, 0.665000, 0.980000, 0.925000,
0.887667, 0.662667, 0.862667, 1.077333, 1.442333, 0.660000, 1.890000,
0.672333, 0.795000, 0.647667, 0.692333, 0.750000, 0.865000,
This doesn't look all that unhealthy.
> Could you try to hack recvfrom() for your socket to always copy some
> empty buffer and check the results without waiting for packet?
That might be out of my reach before tomorrow :-)
> If you are not hurry I can test it myself tomorrow.
Thanks. My major problem is that in my measurements, I quite often see the
'worst case' 4usec result. It would not be a problem if it happens only
once, of course.
Bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-20 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-19 23:14 nonblocking UDPv4 recvfrom() taking 4usec @ 3GHz? bert hubert
2007-02-19 23:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-20 8:04 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 10:50 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-20 16:27 ` all syscalls initially taking 4usec on a P4? " bert hubert
2007-02-20 16:41 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 17:02 ` bert hubert [this message]
2007-02-20 17:11 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 17:18 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 11:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 11:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-20 18:42 ` Josef Sipek
2007-02-20 18:48 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 19:33 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 19:40 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-02-20 20:45 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 21:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-20 22:02 ` Rick Jones
2007-02-20 22:17 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 22:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-21 16:25 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-20 22:46 ` Ian McDonald
2007-02-25 10:41 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-25 17:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 16:57 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070220170232.GA4730@outpost.ds9a.nl \
--to=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).