From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFT] bridge: eliminate port_check workqueue
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:55:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070221105555.4d1b40a6@freekitty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070221142342.GB134@tv-sign.ru>
This is what I was suggesting by getting rid of the work queue completely.
---
net/bridge/br_if.c | 34 ++++++++--------------------------
net/bridge/br_notify.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
net/bridge/br_private.h | 5 ++---
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
--- bridge.orig/net/bridge/br_if.c 2007-02-21 10:22:46.000000000 -0800
+++ bridge/net/bridge/br_if.c 2007-02-21 10:53:25.000000000 -0800
@@ -77,26 +77,15 @@
* Called from work queue to allow for calling functions that
* might sleep (such as speed check), and to debounce.
*/
-static void port_carrier_check(struct work_struct *work)
+void br_port_carrier_check(struct net_bridge_port *p)
{
- struct net_bridge_port *p;
- struct net_device *dev;
- struct net_bridge *br;
-
- dev = container_of(work, struct net_bridge_port,
- carrier_check.work)->dev;
- work_release(work);
-
- rtnl_lock();
- p = dev->br_port;
- if (!p)
- goto done;
- br = p->br;
+ struct net_device *dev = p->dev;
+ struct net_bridge *br = p->br;
if (netif_carrier_ok(dev))
p->path_cost = port_cost(dev);
- if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
+ if (netif_running(br->dev)) {
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
if (netif_carrier_ok(dev)) {
if (p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
@@ -107,9 +96,6 @@
}
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
}
-done:
- dev_put(dev);
- rtnl_unlock();
}
static void release_nbp(struct kobject *kobj)
@@ -162,9 +148,6 @@
dev_set_promiscuity(dev, -1);
- if (cancel_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check))
- dev_put(dev);
-
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
br_stp_disable_port(p);
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
@@ -282,7 +265,6 @@
p->port_no = index;
br_init_port(p);
p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK_NAR(&p->carrier_check, port_carrier_check);
br_stp_port_timer_init(p);
kobject_init(&p->kobj);
@@ -442,16 +424,16 @@
dev_set_promiscuity(dev, 1);
list_add_rcu(&p->list, &br->port_list);
-
+
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br);
br_features_recompute(br);
- if (schedule_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check, BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE))
- dev_hold(dev);
-
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
dev_set_mtu(br->dev, br_min_mtu(br));
+
+ br_port_carrier_check(p);
+
kobject_uevent(&p->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
return 0;
--- bridge.orig/net/bridge/br_notify.c 2007-02-21 10:26:26.000000000 -0800
+++ bridge/net/bridge/br_notify.c 2007-02-21 10:34:12.000000000 -0800
@@ -42,51 +42,48 @@
br = p->br;
- spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
switch (event) {
case NETDEV_CHANGEMTU:
dev_set_mtu(br->dev, br_min_mtu(br));
break;
case NETDEV_CHANGEADDR:
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
br_fdb_changeaddr(p, dev->dev_addr);
br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, p);
br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
break;
case NETDEV_CHANGE:
- if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP)
- if (schedule_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check,
- BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE))
- dev_hold(dev);
+ br_port_carrier_check(p);
break;
case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
- if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP)
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
+ if (netif_running(br->dev))
br_features_recompute(br);
-
- /* could do recursive feature change notification
- * but who would care??
- */
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
break;
case NETDEV_DOWN:
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP)
br_stp_disable_port(p);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
break;
case NETDEV_UP:
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
if (netif_carrier_ok(dev) && (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP))
br_stp_enable_port(p);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
break;
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
- spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
br_del_if(br, dev);
- goto done;
+ break;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
- done:
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
--- bridge.orig/net/bridge/br_private.h 2007-02-21 10:22:43.000000000 -0800
+++ bridge/net/bridge/br_private.h 2007-02-21 10:53:49.000000000 -0800
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
#define _BR_PRIVATE_H
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
-#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
#include <linux/if_bridge.h>
#define BR_HASH_BITS 8
@@ -29,7 +28,7 @@
#define BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE (HZ/10)
-#define BR_VERSION "2.2"
+#define BR_VERSION "2.3"
typedef struct bridge_id bridge_id;
typedef struct mac_addr mac_addr;
@@ -82,7 +81,6 @@
struct timer_list hold_timer;
struct timer_list message_age_timer;
struct kobject kobj;
- struct delayed_work carrier_check;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
@@ -173,6 +171,7 @@
int clone);
/* br_if.c */
+extern void br_port_carrier_check(struct net_bridge_port *p);
extern int br_add_bridge(const char *name);
extern int br_del_bridge(const char *name);
extern void br_cleanup_bridges(void);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-21 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-20 22:19 [PATCH] net/bridge/br_if.c: fix possible use-after-free in port_carrier_check() Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-21 0:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-21 8:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-02-21 9:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-02-21 14:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-21 18:55 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-02-21 20:09 ` [RFT] bridge: eliminate port_check workqueue Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-21 21:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-21 21:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-22 8:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-02-21 14:22 ` [PATCH] net/bridge/br_if.c: fix possible use-after-free in port_carrier_check() Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070221105555.4d1b40a6@freekitty \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).