* [-mm patch] remove one remaining "#define BCM_TSO 1" [not found] <20070111222627.66bb75ab.akpm@osdl.org> @ 2007-01-21 19:13 ` Adrian Bunk 2007-01-24 13:53 ` 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error Adrian Bunk 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Adrian Bunk @ 2007-01-21 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton, jgarzik; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, Arjan van de Ven On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:26:27PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.20-rc3-mm1: >... > git-netdev-all.patch >... > git trees >... Since it's no longer used, this "#define BCM_TSO 1" can now be removed. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> --- linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/bnx2.c.old 2007-01-21 18:25:52.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/bnx2.c 2007-01-21 18:25:58.000000000 +0100 @@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ #include <net/ip.h> #include <net/tcp.h> #include <net/checksum.h> -#define BCM_TSO 1 #include <linux/workqueue.h> #include <linux/crc32.h> #include <linux/prefetch.h> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error [not found] <20070111222627.66bb75ab.akpm@osdl.org> 2007-01-21 19:13 ` [-mm patch] remove one remaining "#define BCM_TSO 1" Adrian Bunk @ 2007-01-24 13:53 ` Adrian Bunk 2007-01-24 14:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Adrian Bunk @ 2007-01-24 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton, Sergei Shtylyov, Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev 3x59x-fix-pci-resource-management.patch causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PCI=n: <-- snip --> ... CC drivers/net/3c59x.o /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c: In function 'vortex_init_one': /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:961: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_regions' /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:985: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_regions' make[3]: *** [drivers/net/3c59x.o] Error 1 <-- snip --> cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error 2007-01-24 13:53 ` 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error Adrian Bunk @ 2007-01-24 14:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2007-02-17 19:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-01-24 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, netdev Hello. Adrian Bunk wrote: > 3x59x-fix-pci-resource-management.patch causes the following compile > error with CONFIG_PCI=n: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > CC drivers/net/3c59x.o > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c: In function 'vortex_init_one': > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:961: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_regions' > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:985: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_regions' > make[3]: *** [drivers/net/3c59x.o] Error 1 Grr, at at the same time it's happy with pci_enable_device(). I'd say the problem is in <linux/pci.h>, not in the patch. > cu > Adrian MBR, Sergei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error 2007-01-24 14:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-02-17 19:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2007-02-17 19:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-02-17 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, netdev Hello, I wrote: >> 3x59x-fix-pci-resource-management.patch causes the following compile >> error with CONFIG_PCI=n: >> <-- snip --> >> ... >> CC drivers/net/3c59x.o >> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c: >> In function 'vortex_init_one': >> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:961: >> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_regions' >> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:985: >> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_regions' >> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/3c59x.o] Error 1 > Grr, at at the same time it's happy with pci_enable_device(). > I'd say the problem is in <linux/pci.h>, not in the patch. Has there been any patch to fix the "unbalanced" pci_{request|release}_regions() declarations? Am I suposed to create such? >> cu >> Adrian MBR, Sergei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error 2007-02-17 19:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-02-17 19:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2007-02-26 13:22 ` Sergei Shtylyov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-02-17 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, netdev Hello. Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>> 3x59x-fix-pci-resource-management.patch causes the following compile >>> error with CONFIG_PCI=n: >>> <-- snip --> >>> ... >>> CC drivers/net/3c59x.o >>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c: >>> In function 'vortex_init_one': >>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:961: >>> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_regions' >>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:985: >>> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_regions' >>> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/3c59x.o] Error 1 > > >> Grr, at at the same time it's happy with pci_enable_device(). >> I'd say the problem is in <linux/pci.h>, not in the patch. > Has there been any patch to fix the "unbalanced" > pci_{request|release}_regions() declarations? Am I suposed to create such? Alternatively, vortex_{init|remove_one() and struct pci_driver there could have been put under #ifdef CONFIG_PCI (good idea anyway -- should reduce driver size on non-PCI systems)... >>> cu >>> Adrian MBR, Sergei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error 2007-02-17 19:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-02-26 13:22 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2007-02-26 17:26 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-02-26 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-pci; +Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, netdev Hello, I wrote: >>>> 3x59x-fix-pci-resource-management.patch causes the following compile >>>> error with CONFIG_PCI=n: >>>> <-- snip --> >>>> ... >>>> CC drivers/net/3c59x.o >>>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c: >>>> In function 'vortex_init_one': >>>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:961: >>>> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_regions' >>>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:985: >>>> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_regions' >>>> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/3c59x.o] Error 1 >>> Grr, at at the same time it's happy with pci_enable_device(). >>> I'd say the problem is in <linux/pci.h>, not in the patch. >> Has there been any patch to fix the "unbalanced" >> pci_{request|release}_regions() declarations? Am I suposed to create >> such? > Alternatively, vortex_{init|remove_one() and struct pci_driver there > could have been put under #ifdef CONFIG_PCI (good idea anyway -- should > reduce driver size on non-PCI systems)... I wonder if I may count on any feedback on this -- asking linux-pci now... The issue is as follows: with my patch pci_{request|release}_regions() may be called with CONFIG_PCI=n (probably, this never has been a issue before) but <linux/pci.h> don't have them declared in this case -- unlike pci_enable_device() which is just empty for CONFIG_PCI=n. Now, what kind of approach do I take: - a "fair one", so that pci_{request|release}_regions() get "balanced" declarations in the header like pci_enable_device(); - a "local one" (and even saving non-PCI kernel from needless bloat), i.e. #ifdef out functions that are only meaningful with CONFIG_PCI=y)? I'm leaning to the second now... >>>> cu >>>> Adrian MBR, Sergei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error 2007-02-26 13:22 ` Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-02-26 17:26 ` Randy Dunlap 2007-02-26 21:14 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2007-02-26 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: linux-pci, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, netdev On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:22:27 +0300 Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello, I wrote: > > >>>> 3x59x-fix-pci-resource-management.patch causes the following compile > >>>> error with CONFIG_PCI=n: > > >>>> <-- snip --> > > >>>> ... > >>>> CC drivers/net/3c59x.o > >>>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c: > >>>> In function 'vortex_init_one': > >>>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:961: > >>>> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_regions' > >>>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:985: > >>>> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_regions' > >>>> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/3c59x.o] Error 1 > > >>> Grr, at at the same time it's happy with pci_enable_device(). > >>> I'd say the problem is in <linux/pci.h>, not in the patch. > > >> Has there been any patch to fix the "unbalanced" > >> pci_{request|release}_regions() declarations? Am I suposed to create > >> such? > > > Alternatively, vortex_{init|remove_one() and struct pci_driver there > > could have been put under #ifdef CONFIG_PCI (good idea anyway -- should > > reduce driver size on non-PCI systems)... > > I wonder if I may count on any feedback on this -- asking linux-pci now... > The issue is as follows: with my patch pci_{request|release}_regions() may > be called with CONFIG_PCI=n (probably, this never has been a issue before) but > <linux/pci.h> don't have them declared in this case -- unlike > pci_enable_device() which is just empty for CONFIG_PCI=n. > Now, what kind of approach do I take: > > - a "fair one", so that pci_{request|release}_regions() get "balanced" > declarations in the header like pci_enable_device(); > > - a "local one" (and even saving non-PCI kernel from needless bloat), i.e. > #ifdef out functions that are only meaningful with CONFIG_PCI=y)? > > I'm leaning to the second now... I'd prefer the fair one -- add stubs to include/linux/pci.h. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error 2007-02-26 17:26 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2007-02-26 21:14 ` Greg KH 2007-03-06 16:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2007-02-26 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Sergei Shtylyov, linux-pci, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, netdev On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:26:44AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:22:27 +0300 Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > > Hello, I wrote: > > > > >>>> 3x59x-fix-pci-resource-management.patch causes the following compile > > >>>> error with CONFIG_PCI=n: > > > > >>>> <-- snip --> > > > > >>>> ... > > >>>> CC drivers/net/3c59x.o > > >>>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c: > > >>>> In function 'vortex_init_one': > > >>>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:961: > > >>>> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_regions' > > >>>> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:985: > > >>>> error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_regions' > > >>>> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/3c59x.o] Error 1 > > > > >>> Grr, at at the same time it's happy with pci_enable_device(). > > >>> I'd say the problem is in <linux/pci.h>, not in the patch. > > > > >> Has there been any patch to fix the "unbalanced" > > >> pci_{request|release}_regions() declarations? Am I suposed to create > > >> such? > > > > > Alternatively, vortex_{init|remove_one() and struct pci_driver there > > > could have been put under #ifdef CONFIG_PCI (good idea anyway -- should > > > reduce driver size on non-PCI systems)... > > > > I wonder if I may count on any feedback on this -- asking linux-pci now... > > The issue is as follows: with my patch pci_{request|release}_regions() may > > be called with CONFIG_PCI=n (probably, this never has been a issue before) but > > <linux/pci.h> don't have them declared in this case -- unlike > > pci_enable_device() which is just empty for CONFIG_PCI=n. > > Now, what kind of approach do I take: > > > > - a "fair one", so that pci_{request|release}_regions() get "balanced" > > declarations in the header like pci_enable_device(); > > > > - a "local one" (and even saving non-PCI kernel from needless bloat), i.e. > > #ifdef out functions that are only meaningful with CONFIG_PCI=y)? > > > > I'm leaning to the second now... > > I'd prefer the fair one -- add stubs to include/linux/pci.h. Me too, please just send me a patch adding them to pci.h so you don't have to have #ifdefs in your .c code. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error 2007-02-26 21:14 ` Greg KH @ 2007-03-06 16:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2007-03-06 16:47 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-03-06 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH Cc: Randy Dunlap, linux-pci, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, netdev Hello. Greg KH wrote: >>>>>>>3x59x-fix-pci-resource-management.patch causes the following compile >>>>>>>error with CONFIG_PCI=n: >>>>>>><-- snip --> >>>>>>>... >>>>>>> CC drivers/net/3c59x.o >>>>>>>/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c: >>>>>>>In function 'vortex_init_one': >>>>>>>/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:961: >>>>>>>error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_regions' >>>>>>>/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:985: >>>>>>>error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_regions' >>>>>>>make[3]: *** [drivers/net/3c59x.o] Error 1 >>>>>> Grr, at at the same time it's happy with pci_enable_device(). >>>>>> I'd say the problem is in <linux/pci.h>, not in the patch. >>>>> Has there been any patch to fix the "unbalanced" >>>>>pci_{request|release}_regions() declarations? Am I suposed to create >>>>>such? >>>> Alternatively, vortex_{init|remove_one() and struct pci_driver there >>>>could have been put under #ifdef CONFIG_PCI (good idea anyway -- should >>>>reduce driver size on non-PCI systems)... >>> I wonder if I may count on any feedback on this -- asking linux-pci now... >>> The issue is as follows: with my patch pci_{request|release}_regions() may >>>be called with CONFIG_PCI=n (probably, this never has been a issue before) but >>><linux/pci.h> don't have them declared in this case -- unlike >>>pci_enable_device() which is just empty for CONFIG_PCI=n. >>> Now, what kind of approach do I take: >>>- a "fair one", so that pci_{request|release}_regions() get "balanced" >>> declarations in the header like pci_enable_device(); >>>- a "local one" (and even saving non-PCI kernel from needless bloat), i.e. >>> #ifdef out functions that are only meaningful with CONFIG_PCI=y)? >>> I'm leaning to the second now... >>I'd prefer the fair one -- add stubs to include/linux/pci.h. > Me too, please just send me a patch adding them to pci.h so you don't > have to have #ifdefs in your .c code. Erm, before I do that, could somebody explain what #define HAVE_PCI_REQ_REGIONS 2 accompanying their declaration is for? I have't found any references to it in the source. Should I duplicate it for CONFIG_PCI=n case (I guess not)? > thanks, > greg k-h WBR, Sergei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error 2007-03-06 16:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov @ 2007-03-06 16:47 ` Randy Dunlap 2007-03-09 12:54 ` Tejun Heo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2007-03-06 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergei Shtylyov, htejun Cc: Greg KH, linux-pci, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, netdev On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:15:12 +0300 Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Greg KH wrote: > > >>>>>>>3x59x-fix-pci-resource-management.patch causes the following compile > >>>>>>>error with CONFIG_PCI=n: > > >>>>>>><-- snip --> > > >>>>>>>... > >>>>>>> CC drivers/net/3c59x.o > >>>>>>>/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c: > >>>>>>>In function 'vortex_init_one': > >>>>>>>/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:961: > >>>>>>>error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_regions' > >>>>>>>/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/3c59x.c:985: > >>>>>>>error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_regions' > >>>>>>>make[3]: *** [drivers/net/3c59x.o] Error 1 > > >>>>>> Grr, at at the same time it's happy with pci_enable_device(). > >>>>>> I'd say the problem is in <linux/pci.h>, not in the patch. > > >>>>> Has there been any patch to fix the "unbalanced" > >>>>>pci_{request|release}_regions() declarations? Am I suposed to create > >>>>>such? > > >>>> Alternatively, vortex_{init|remove_one() and struct pci_driver there > >>>>could have been put under #ifdef CONFIG_PCI (good idea anyway -- should > >>>>reduce driver size on non-PCI systems)... > > >>> I wonder if I may count on any feedback on this -- asking linux-pci now... > >>> The issue is as follows: with my patch pci_{request|release}_regions() may > >>>be called with CONFIG_PCI=n (probably, this never has been a issue before) but > >>><linux/pci.h> don't have them declared in this case -- unlike > >>>pci_enable_device() which is just empty for CONFIG_PCI=n. > >>> Now, what kind of approach do I take: > > >>>- a "fair one", so that pci_{request|release}_regions() get "balanced" > >>> declarations in the header like pci_enable_device(); > > >>>- a "local one" (and even saving non-PCI kernel from needless bloat), i.e. > >>> #ifdef out functions that are only meaningful with CONFIG_PCI=y)? > > >>> I'm leaning to the second now... > > >>I'd prefer the fair one -- add stubs to include/linux/pci.h. > > > Me too, please just send me a patch adding them to pci.h so you don't > > have to have #ifdefs in your .c code. > > Erm, before I do that, could somebody explain what > > #define HAVE_PCI_REQ_REGIONS 2 > > accompanying their declaration is for? I have't found any references to it in > the source. Should I duplicate it for CONFIG_PCI=n case (I guess not)? I wouldn't since it's not used anywhere, but maybe Tejun could comment on it... --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error 2007-03-06 16:47 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2007-03-09 12:54 ` Tejun Heo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-03-09 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Sergei Shtylyov, Greg KH, linux-pci, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, netdev Hello, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Erm, before I do that, could somebody explain what >> >> #define HAVE_PCI_REQ_REGIONS 2 >> >> accompanying their declaration is for? I have't found any references to it in >> the source. Should I duplicate it for CONFIG_PCI=n case (I guess not)? > > I wouldn't since it's not used anywhere, but maybe Tejun could comment > on it... This is the first time I see that macro. There is no user in the whole source. I think the best way is to just kill it. Thanks. -- tejun ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-09 12:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20070111222627.66bb75ab.akpm@osdl.org>
2007-01-21 19:13 ` [-mm patch] remove one remaining "#define BCM_TSO 1" Adrian Bunk
2007-01-24 13:53 ` 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error Adrian Bunk
2007-01-24 14:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-17 19:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-17 19:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-26 13:22 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-26 17:26 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-02-26 21:14 ` Greg KH
2007-03-06 16:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-03-06 16:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-03-09 12:54 ` Tejun Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).