From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
bridge@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: avoid ptype_all packet handling
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:56:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070228195611.24cf19ee@deepthought> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45E62C29.7010203@candelatech.com>
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:28:09 -0800
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > I was measuring bridging/routing performance and noticed this.
> >
> > The current code runs the "all packet" type handlers before calling
> > the bridge hook. If an application (like some DHCP clients) is
> > using AF_PACKET, this means that each received packet gets run
> > through the Berkeley Packet Filter code in sk_run_filter (slow).
> >
> > By moving the bridging hook to run first, the packets flowing
> > through the bridge get filtered out there. This results in a 14%
> > improvement in performance, but it does mean that some snooping
> > applications would miss packets if being used on a bridge. The
> > correct way to see all packets on a bridge is to set the bridge
> > pseudo-device to promiscuous mode.
>
> Seems it would be better to fix these clients to be more selective as
> to where they bind.
The problem is any use of BPF is a lose, if it has to be done to all
traffic.
> This breaks the case where you want to see packets on a particular
> interface, not just the entire bridge, right?
It might be possible to use promisc counter to handle this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-01 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-01 1:18 [PATCH] bridge: avoid ptype_all packet handling Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-01 1:28 ` Ben Greear
2007-03-01 3:56 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-03-01 4:05 ` Ben Greear
2007-03-01 7:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-01 7:22 ` David Miller
2007-03-01 7:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-01 7:30 ` David Miller
2007-03-01 11:47 ` jamal
2007-03-03 2:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-03 4:22 ` David Miller
2007-03-03 7:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-03 12:30 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-02 21:26 ` David Miller
2007-03-02 22:09 ` [RFC 1/2] " Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-02 22:14 ` [RFC 2/2] bridge: per device promiscious taps Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-02 22:48 ` [RFC 1/2] bridge: avoid ptype_all packet handling David Miller
2007-03-02 23:18 ` David Miller
2007-03-02 23:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-02 23:41 ` David Miller
2007-03-03 5:38 ` Herbert Xu
2007-03-03 5:59 ` David Miller
2007-03-03 6:42 ` Herbert Xu
2007-03-02 22:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-03 12:04 ` [PATCH] " Stefan Rompf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070228195611.24cf19ee@deepthought \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bridge@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).