From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [TCP]: Add two new spurious RTO responses to FRTO
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:20:15 +0100
Message-ID: <20070301122015.GA3350@ff.dom.local>
References: <20070228121302.GA2983@ff.dom.local> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703011312250.19465@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.go2.pl ([193.17.41.42]:55641 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S965035AbXCAMQa (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:16:30 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703011312250.19465@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 01:30:20PM +0200, Ilpo J=E4rvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
=2E..
> > Probably something for the next "BTW".
=2E..
> missing. Spotted by Jarek Poplawski.

Thanks! But I really think such a cosmetic suggestion
isn't worth to mention.

Jarek P.