From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: akepner@sgi.com
Cc: linux@horizon.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Extensible hashing and RCU
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:52:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070302085246.GA30951@2ka.mipt.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070217131302.GA22732@2ka.mipt.ru>
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 04:13:02PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru) wrote:
> > >I noticed in an LCA talk mention that apprently extensible hashing
> > >with RCU access is an unsolved problem. Here's an idea for solving it.
> > >....
> >
> > Yes, I have been playing around with the same idea for
> > doing dynamic resizing of the TCP hashtable.
> >
> > Did a prototype "toy" implementation, and I have a
> > "half-finished" patch which resizes the TCP hashtable
> > at runtime. Hmmm, your mail may be the impetus to get
> > me to finally finish this thing....
>
> Why anyone do not want to use trie - for socket-like loads it has
> exactly constant search/insert/delete time and scales as hell.
Ok, I've ran an analysis of linked lists and trie traversals and found
that (at least on x86) optimized one list traversal is about 4 (!)
times faster than one bit lookup in trie traversal (or actually one
lookup in binary tree-like structure) - that is because of the fact
that trie traversal needs to have more instructions per lookup, and at
least one additional branch which can not be predicted.
Tests with rdtsc shows that one bit lookup in trie (actually it is any
lookup in binary tree structures) is about 3-4 times slower than one
lookup in linked list.
Since hash table usually has upto 4 elements in each hash entry,
competing binary tree/trie stucture must get an entry in one lookup,
which is essentially impossible with usual tree/trie implementations.
Things dramatically change when linked list became too long, but it
should not happend with proper resizing of the hash table, wildcards
implementation also introduce additional requirements, which can not be
easily solved in hash tables.
So I get my words about tree/trie implementation instead of hash table
for socket lookup back.
Interested reader can find more details on tests, asm outputs and
conclusions at:
http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/blog/2007/03/01#2007_03_01
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-02 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-04 7:41 Extensible hashing and RCU linux
2007-02-05 18:02 ` akepner
2007-02-17 13:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-18 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-18 19:10 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-18 20:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-18 21:23 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-18 22:04 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-19 12:04 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-19 19:18 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-19 11:41 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-19 13:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-19 13:56 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-19 14:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-19 14:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-19 15:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-19 18:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-19 18:26 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-02-19 18:38 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-02-20 9:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 9:57 ` David Miller
2007-02-20 10:22 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 10:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 10:12 ` David Miller
2007-02-20 10:30 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 11:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 11:23 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 11:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 11:41 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 10:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 15:07 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-20 15:11 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 15:49 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-20 15:59 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 16:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 16:20 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 16:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 16:59 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 17:05 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 17:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 18:00 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 18:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 19:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 19:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 19:36 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 19:44 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-20 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 17:55 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 18:12 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 19:13 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-20 19:44 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 20:03 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-20 20:09 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-21 8:56 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 9:34 ` David Miller
2007-02-21 9:51 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 10:03 ` David Miller
2007-02-21 8:54 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 9:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-21 9:27 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 9:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-21 9:57 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 21:15 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-22 9:06 ` David Miller
2007-02-22 11:00 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-22 11:07 ` David Miller
2007-02-22 19:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-20 16:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-22 23:49 ` linux
2007-02-23 2:31 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-02-20 10:44 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 11:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 11:29 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 11:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-20 11:45 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 12:41 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-21 13:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-21 13:37 ` David Miller
2007-02-21 23:13 ` Robert Olsson
2007-02-22 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-22 11:41 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-22 11:44 ` David Miller
2007-02-20 12:11 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-19 22:10 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-19 12:02 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-19 12:35 ` Robert Olsson
2007-02-19 14:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-02 8:52 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2007-03-02 9:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-02 10:28 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-02 20:45 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-03-03 10:46 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-04 10:02 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-03-04 20:36 ` David Miller
2007-03-05 7:12 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-03-05 10:02 ` Robert Olsson
2007-03-05 10:00 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-13 9:32 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-13 10:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-13 10:24 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-05 18:41 ` [RFC/TOY]Extensible " akepner
2007-02-06 19:09 ` linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070302085246.GA30951@2ka.mipt.ru \
--to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=akepner@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).