From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: bridge@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] bridge: avoid ptype_all packet handling
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:34:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070302153414.4d8304e0@freekitty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070302.151803.74748558.davem@davemloft.net>
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:18:03 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:48:18 -0800 (PST)
>
> > Back to a workable solution, why doesn't DHCP specify a specific
> > device? It would fix this performance problem completely, at the
> > application level.
>
> Since nobody seems to be able to be bothered to actually look
> at what DHCP clients are doing, I actually did and it's no
> surprise that broken stuff is happening here.
I was in middle of checking that..
> Here is how dhcp3-3.0.3 binds AF_PACKET sockets, in common/lpf.c:
>
> struct sockaddr sa;
> ...
> /* Bind to the interface name */
> memset (&sa, 0, sizeof sa);
> sa.sa_family = AF_PACKET;
> strncpy (sa.sa_data, (const char *)info -> ifp, sizeof sa.sa_data);
> if (bind (sock, &sa, sizeof sa)) {
> if (errno == ENOPROTOOPT || errno == EPROTONOSUPPORT ||
> errno == ESOCKTNOSUPPORT || errno == EPFNOSUPPORT ||
> errno == EAFNOSUPPORT || errno == EINVAL) {
> log_error ("socket: %m - make sure");
> log_error ("CONFIG_PACKET (Packet socket) %s",
> "and CONFIG_FILTER");
> log_error ("(Socket Filtering) are enabled %s",
> "in your kernel");
> log_fatal ("configuration!");
> }
> log_fatal ("Bind socket to interface: %m");
> }
>
> So it puts a string into the sockaddr data, and there
> is no mention of sockaddr_ll, which is what is supposed to be
> provided as the socket address here, in the entire DHCP tree.
>
> I'm tempted to say I must be missing something here, since I can't see
> how this could possible work at all. The string passed in should
> be interpreted as the ifindex value, and thus trigger a -ENODEV
> return from AF_PACKET's bind() implementation.
>
> My suspicions are confirmed by the patch here:
>
> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chuyee/patches/dhcp-3.0/dhcp-3.0-linux_cooked_packet.patch
Can you get FC fixed?
> Really, this bogus bind() explains everything.
Should we add a warning to kernel log, to make distro's fix it?
It might make sense to add a per-device ptype_dev list in network device?
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-02 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-01 1:18 [PATCH] bridge: avoid ptype_all packet handling Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-01 1:28 ` Ben Greear
2007-03-01 3:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-01 4:05 ` Ben Greear
2007-03-01 7:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-01 7:22 ` David Miller
2007-03-01 7:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-01 7:30 ` David Miller
2007-03-01 11:47 ` jamal
2007-03-03 2:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-03 4:22 ` David Miller
2007-03-03 7:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-03 12:30 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-02 21:26 ` David Miller
2007-03-02 22:09 ` [RFC 1/2] " Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-02 22:14 ` [RFC 2/2] bridge: per device promiscious taps Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-02 22:48 ` [RFC 1/2] bridge: avoid ptype_all packet handling David Miller
2007-03-02 23:18 ` David Miller
2007-03-02 23:34 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-03-02 23:41 ` David Miller
2007-03-03 5:38 ` Herbert Xu
2007-03-03 5:59 ` David Miller
2007-03-03 6:42 ` Herbert Xu
2007-03-02 22:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-03 12:04 ` [PATCH] " Stefan Rompf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070302153414.4d8304e0@freekitty \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bridge@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).