From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC NET_SCHED 00/03]: ktime + nano-second clock resolution for packet schedulers Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:09:28 -0800 Message-ID: <20070305110928.25ce596c@freekitty> References: <20070304190439.21142.66736.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070304.162557.112625456.davem@davemloft.net> <45EC5682.6000406@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:60675 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932195AbXCETJh (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:09:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <45EC5682.6000406@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:42:26 +0100 Patrick McHardy wrote: > David Miller wrote: > > Frankly, I think now that we have ktime and all of the proper generic > > infrastructure to do this stuff properly, I think we should just use > > ktime for the packet scheduler across the board and just delete all of > > that old by-hand timekeeping selection crap from pkt_sched.h > > Sounds good, I'm going to remove all other clock sources. > Will resend in a couple of days after fixing a few more > problems I noticed. > Don't bother changing netem. I have a version that uses hrtimer's and doesn't use PSCHED() clock source anymore. -- Stephen Hemminger